Greatest conquerors in history

Discussions regarding actual culture and history of Earth.
Solarius
roman
roman
Posts: 1185
Joined: Mon 30 Aug 2010, 00:23

Greatest conquerors in history

Post by Solarius » Fri 02 Mar 2012, 14:44

Who, in your opinion, are the greatest conquerors in history?

I would say that Genghis Khan (of course), Pachacuti, and maybe Pizzaro. I may add to this post later!
Check out Ussaria!
User avatar
Thakowsaizmu
puremetal
puremetal
Posts: 3821
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2010, 17:57
Contact:

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by Thakowsaizmu » Fri 02 Mar 2012, 16:25

Qin Shi Huangdi.
User avatar
Micamo
MVP
MVP
Posts: 7148
Joined: Sun 05 Sep 2010, 18:48

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by Micamo » Fri 02 Mar 2012, 18:27

Depends on what you mean by "greatest."

Slaughtered the most people that they didn't like? Definitely Joseph Stalin.

The conqueror I'd most like to live under? I nominate my cat.
User avatar
cybrxkhan
mayan
mayan
Posts: 1591
Joined: Sat 25 Dec 2010, 21:21
Contact:

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by cybrxkhan » Fri 02 Mar 2012, 18:40

I'd say Genghis Khan and his direct descendants: conquered something almost the size of the British Empire in a couple of decades. With an army of no more than 125000. And he wasn't actually too bad of a douchebag, with the tolerance for all religions and merit-based system of governing and all... well, unless if you pissed him off, then he killed every single man, woman, child, dog, cat, insect, ghost, and imaginary friend related to you, so yeah.
I now have a blog. Witness the horror.

I think I think, therefore I think I am.
- Ambrose Bierce
User avatar
Omzinesý
mayan
mayan
Posts: 2231
Joined: Fri 27 Aug 2010, 07:17
Location: nowhere [naʊhɪɚ]

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by Omzinesý » Fri 02 Mar 2012, 20:16

What about the Inka, whoever he was when the empire was grounded very quickly.
Solarius
roman
roman
Posts: 1185
Joined: Mon 30 Aug 2010, 00:23

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by Solarius » Fri 02 Mar 2012, 20:23

Omzinesý wrote:What about the Inka, whoever he was when the empire was grounded very quickly.
That's Pachacuti. :roll:
Check out Ussaria!
User avatar
Avjunza
sinic
sinic
Posts: 295
Joined: Sun 15 Aug 2010, 07:18
Location: Aotearoa

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by Avjunza » Sat 03 Mar 2012, 15:39

Gandhi. He conquered India without even fighting.
Image
User avatar
CrazyEttin
greek
greek
Posts: 578
Joined: Mon 28 Feb 2011, 19:43

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by CrazyEttin » Sat 03 Mar 2012, 17:25

Avjunza wrote:Gandhi. He conquered India without even fighting.
[+1]

And if not Gandhi, then propably Gengis Khan.
Bristel
greek
greek
Posts: 527
Joined: Sat 14 Aug 2010, 18:50

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by Bristel » Tue 06 Mar 2012, 07:26

Gengis Khan.
[bɹ̠ˤʷɪs.təɫ]
Nōn quālibet inīqua cupiditāte illectus hōc agō.
[tiː.mɔ.tʉɥs god.lɐf hɑwk]
brandrinn
hieroglyphic
hieroglyphic
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu 02 Feb 2012, 18:47

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by brandrinn » Wed 07 Mar 2012, 03:05

Avjunza wrote:Gandhi. He conquered India without even fighting.
Maybe it's Once Upon a Time for conquering the female 25-35 demographic.
No, no, it's Susan Boyle because she conquered our hearts.
User avatar
Ànradh
mayan
mayan
Posts: 2078
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2011, 02:57
Location: Dunoon, Scotland

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by Ànradh » Wed 07 Mar 2012, 07:45

brandrinn wrote:Maybe it's Once Upon a Time for conquering the female 25-35 demographic.
No, no, it's Susan Boyle because she conquered our hearts.
... O_o
I'm goin' for Gengis.

Though as conqerers go, many lesser names much closer to home have affected me to a greater extent. A certain William is eponymous with the concept of taking other people's stuff.
Then there's Caesar (not exactly a 'lesser name') and Plautius, whose contact with Britain seem to be key links in the chain of events that lead to English being so... 'odd'.
And there's Cromwell too, of course.
Sin ar Pàrras agus nì sinne mar a thogras sinn. Choisinn sinn e agus ’s urrainn dhuinn ga loisgeadh.
SomeoneSomewhere
sinic
sinic
Posts: 333
Joined: Fri 06 May 2011, 20:18

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by SomeoneSomewhere » Wed 07 Mar 2012, 21:42

Avjunza wrote:Gandhi. He conquered India without even fighting.
And the British empire with a bamboo stick, as a textbook from history states! :3 I found it rather amusing at the time.
Image
:eng: Native speaker! | :fra: Learning, slowly but surely! | :cym: Dabbling in!
User avatar
DanH34
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 198
Joined: Fri 13 Jan 2012, 01:12
Location: North of The Wall

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by DanH34 » Mon 23 Apr 2012, 19:13

Probably Genghis. I'm worried he'll come back from the dead to destroy my city if I don't give him the credit.

Honourable mention must be made, though, of Tsubodai the Valiant - possible the most successful general in history in terms of his victory:defeat ratio and total amount of territory conquered. And, if the stories are to be believed, he began his life as the lowliest of Mongol tribesmen.

Dan
Life's a bitch, then you die.

Zidhgebzhail Orthography
User avatar
eldin raigmore
fire
fire
Posts: 5680
Joined: Sat 14 Aug 2010, 18:38
Location: SouthEast Michigan

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by eldin raigmore » Mon 23 Apr 2012, 19:27

How does Alexander compare with Genghis?
User avatar
DanH34
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 198
Joined: Fri 13 Jan 2012, 01:12
Location: North of The Wall

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by DanH34 » Mon 23 Apr 2012, 23:32

eldin raigmore wrote:How does Alexander compare with Genghis?
Good question.

All I can offer in reply is the observation that, while Alexander inherited a fully-functional polity with an excellent military from his father, Genghis took a bunch of steppe-dwelling, illiterate, mutton-grease-reeking nomads (whom the Chinese had been keeping at one-anothers' throats for centuries) and turned them from nothing into the most powerful military force the world had (has?) ever seen. And built a postal service that wasn't bested until the development of the godsdamn steam locomotive over half a milennium later.

I notice we don't have your opinion on the greatest conqueror yet, though, Eldin. Do tell.

Also, I suppose that Caesar deserves a mention here, since (here goes:) venit, vidit, vicit.

Dan
Life's a bitch, then you die.

Zidhgebzhail Orthography
User avatar
cybrxkhan
mayan
mayan
Posts: 1591
Joined: Sat 25 Dec 2010, 21:21
Contact:

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by cybrxkhan » Mon 23 Apr 2012, 23:44

eldin raigmore wrote:How does Alexander compare with Genghis?
This is more opinion than fact, but I've always felt that Alexander was the narcissistic megalomaniac that some people portray him as, well Genghis was a cunning, patient, and intelligent strategist - passion vs. rationality, perhaps? Not to mention Genghis was pretty badass as a pre-teen/teen, having to keep his tiny little family alive after it was abandoned by the tribe after his dad died.

Also Genghis has better facial hair.

And he has more descendants than anyone alive.

AND he helped fight against Global Warming before it was even an issue. (article)

Okay, so maybe it is a fact that Genghis makes Alexander look like some wimpy brat of a conqueror who played on easy level.
I now have a blog. Witness the horror.

I think I think, therefore I think I am.
- Ambrose Bierce
User avatar
eldin raigmore
fire
fire
Posts: 5680
Joined: Sat 14 Aug 2010, 18:38
Location: SouthEast Michigan

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by eldin raigmore » Tue 24 Apr 2012, 23:35

DanH34 wrote:I notice we don't have your opinion on the greatest conqueror yet, though, Eldin. Do tell.
I don't really have one.
I do have a conqueror I think is very interesting; namely, Chaka the Zulu.
I have a list of "historical figures I admire, but would rather admire from a distance"; Chaka is one, and Joab (David's sister's son) as another.

DanH34 wrote:venit, vidit, vicit.
I have long liked the "vidi, vici, veni" version better. First-person-singular instead of third-singular-masculine, and the order of the verbs is more enjoyable.

How does Cyrus the Great compare with either Alexander or Genghis?
User avatar
DanH34
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 198
Joined: Fri 13 Jan 2012, 01:12
Location: North of The Wall

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by DanH34 » Wed 25 Apr 2012, 19:16

eldin raigmore wrote: I do have a conqueror I think is very interesting; namely, Chaka the Zulu.
[+1] for the unconventional option. I'd have to go for the 'admire from a distance so I don't get horribly tortured to death' option, though.

Queen Ranavalona I (conclusive historical proof that obscene violence is far from an exclusively male preserve) would also be an interesting one to see from a long way away (ideally a different continent).
Joab (David's sister's son)
Well, if we're going for fictional characters, that changes the game completely.

Uhtred of Bebbanburg.
Thomas Theismann, Javier Giscard, and Lester Tourville.
Heracles.
The list goes on...
I have long liked the "vidi, vici, veni" version better. First-person-singular instead of third-singular-masculine, and the order of the verbs is more enjoyable.
Awesome; does 'come' work as a double-entendre in Latin, or is it just a fortuitous coincidence when used with English? Do/did Latin verbs have gender, though?

Dan
Life's a bitch, then you die.

Zidhgebzhail Orthography
User avatar
eldin raigmore
fire
fire
Posts: 5680
Joined: Sat 14 Aug 2010, 18:38
Location: SouthEast Michigan

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by eldin raigmore » Wed 25 Apr 2012, 22:24

DanH34 wrote:Queen Ranavalona I (conclusive historical proof that obscene violence is far from an exclusively male preserve) would also be an interesting one to see from a long way away (ideally a different continent).
Thanks for telling me about her! I'd never heard of her until your post. Now I've read Wikipedia's entry about her. She was interesting!

DanH34 wrote:
me wrote:Joab (David's sister's son)
Well, if we're going for fictional characters, that changes the game completely.
Uhtred of Bebbanburg.
Thomas Theismann, Javier Giscard, and Lester Tourville.
Heracles.
The list goes on...
No, I think if we allow fictional characters, the game is no longer interesting.
I regard the "history" books of the Hebrew Bible as actual history.
True, up through Joshua, Judges, and Ruth, (and possibly also at least some of I Samuel), it's possibly legendary. (For purposes of this post I define "legend" as a story based on the truth that, for at least some part of its life-cycle, was communicated solely mouth-to-ear rather than hand-to-eye. Legends are therefore more vulnerable to mutation than histories that were always written, starting with eye-witnesses; because "the palest ink is stronger than the strongest memory".)
And a lot of it may also be myth. (For purposes of this post I define "myth" as a story that explains something culturally important, such as the name of a certain thing, or why a certain holiday is observed, or how a certain saying came to be. I don't think either legends or myths have to be false.)
Nevertheless, I think II Samuel, I Kings, II Kings, I Chronicles, and II Chronicles, should count as "history"; so Joab should count as a historical character. The parts of I Samuel having to do with Saul are probably also historical. And the story of Ruth the Moabitess was probably a family legend in Jesse's family.

DanH34 wrote:... does 'come' work as a double-entendre in Latin,
Not as far as I know.
DanH34 wrote:or is it just a fortuitous coincidence when used with English?
As far as I know, it is.
DanH34 wrote:Do/did Latin verbs have gender, though?
I don't think so. But I don't know Latin all that well.

Latin verbal adjectives, such as gerundives and passive participles and active participles, probably agree with the gender of the nouns they modify, don't they? Wouldn't "Amanda" necessarily be feminine?
User avatar
DanH34
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 198
Joined: Fri 13 Jan 2012, 01:12
Location: North of The Wall

Re: Greatest conquerors in history

Post by DanH34 » Wed 25 Apr 2012, 23:28

eldin raigmore wrote:Thanks for telling me about her! I'd never heard of her until your post. Now I've read Wikipedia's entry about her. She was interesting!
You're more than welcome.

I came across her via the ever-wonderful Flashman, who should be required reading for all humans.

Seriously, I can't recommend the series enough.
I regard the "history" books of the Hebrew Bible as actual history.
On what evidence do you base this summation?
I don't think either legends or myths have to be false.
I agreee with you a hundred percent on this one.
Nevertheless, I think ... should count as "history"
Despite the fact that David and Soloman's 'empire' has absolutely no attestation in the historical record?
The parts of I Samuel having to do with Saul are probably also historical.
What makes you say that?
I wrote:... does 'come' work as a double-entendre in Latin,
Not as far as I know.
That's a shame.
Wouldn't "Amanda" necessarily be feminine?
I suppose so. Unless it's Amanda Huginkiss. [:D]

Dan
Life's a bitch, then you die.

Zidhgebzhail Orthography
Post Reply