idea for new conlang

A forum for all topics related to constructed languages
Post Reply
adamcross1000
rupestrian
rupestrian
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu 12 Jul 2018, 05:27

idea for new conlang

Post by adamcross1000 » Thu 12 Jul 2018, 05:31

Hi! I've had this idea to have a simple language phonologically. I want to have 100 syllables in the language and I want each syllable to be a root. I want to take those roots and combine them to make longer and more complex words. What should the 100 roots be?
User avatar
eldin raigmore
fire
fire
Posts: 6168
Joined: Sat 14 Aug 2010, 18:38
Location: SouthEast Michigan

Re: idea for new conlang

Post by eldin raigmore » Thu 12 Jul 2018, 08:45

Look up “oligosynthetic” and follow some of the links you hit.

Also look up “Natural Semantic Metalanguage”. It might give you some ideas.

You might investigate Lojban. Obviously you wouldn’t want to imitate it! It’s not anything like what you want to achieve!
But it might give you some ideas for roots.
User avatar
Shemtov
runic
runic
Posts: 2692
Joined: Mon 29 Apr 2013, 03:06

Re: idea for new conlang

Post by Shemtov » Thu 12 Jul 2018, 20:56

IIIRC, aUI is a Philoauxlang with a similar concept, just using individual phonemes instead of syllables, so look that up too.
Many children make up, or begin to make up, imaginary languages. I have been at it since I could write.
-JRR Tolkien
User avatar
lsd
roman
roman
Posts: 894
Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2011, 21:11
Contact:

Re: idea for new conlang

Post by lsd » Thu 12 Jul 2018, 21:07

my advice:
do not look at other project until you first find your own path...
after you'll get pleasure to compare the different choices of other conlangs with yours...
User avatar
eldin raigmore
fire
fire
Posts: 6168
Joined: Sat 14 Aug 2010, 18:38
Location: SouthEast Michigan

Re: idea for new conlang

Post by eldin raigmore » Thu 12 Jul 2018, 22:09

lsd wrote:
Thu 12 Jul 2018, 21:07
my advice:
do not look at other project until you first find your own path...
after you'll get pleasure to compare the different choices of other conlangs with yours...
Isd has a good point.

You might decide you need to look at other conlangs &/or auxlangs anyway. There might be good reasons you’d want to do that.
If you do, try to be careful.
Maybe only look at those that aren’t also trying to be oligosynthetic (i.e. don’t share exactly your specific design goals)?

—— —— —— ——

In my not-necessarily-correct opinion, none of the resources recommended so far on this thread, pose a significant danger.
But make up your own mind.
Post Reply