(Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

A forum for all topics related to constructed languages
User avatar
Pabappa
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat 18 Nov 2017, 02:41
Contact:

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Pabappa » Sun 12 Aug 2018, 16:11

For example the IE gap of *tl, dl, etc tht survives in moat languages, the scarcity of /ts/ in ancient gk due to >ss,the lack of vl,vr,etc in normal English words. Diachronics explains the ones we know....It's possible pre-PIE had and lost /tl/.
Image
User avatar
Shemtov
runic
runic
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon 29 Apr 2013, 03:06

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Shemtov » Tue 14 Aug 2018, 03:04

Would an althistory where the Romans conquered part of Ireland, which had or has a Romance language competing in those parts with Gaelic work?
Many children make up, or begin to make up, imaginary languages. I have been at it since I could write.
-JRR Tolkien
Ælfwine
greek
greek
Posts: 806
Joined: Mon 21 Sep 2015, 00:28
Location: New Jersey

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Ælfwine » Tue 14 Aug 2018, 03:47

Shemtov wrote:
Tue 14 Aug 2018, 03:04
Would an althistory where the Romans conquered part of Ireland, which had or has a Romance language competing in those parts with Gaelic work?
I don't see why not. OTL the Irish were very much influenced by Rome, even though they never spoke Latin.
My Blog
Current Projects:
Mannish — A North Germanic language spoken on the Calf of Man
Pelsodian — A Romance language spoken around Lake Balaton
Jezik Panoski — A Slavic language spoken in the same area
this_is_an_account
hieroglyphic
hieroglyphic
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue 14 Aug 2018, 05:33

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by this_is_an_account » Tue 14 Aug 2018, 05:40

Hello! This is my first question here. I have an idea for noun declensions that don't change the inflexional affixes of nouns (so a noun in declension 1 would take identical case markings and number markings as a noun in declension 2), but instead would affect what derivational markings a noun got (so a noun in declension 1 would take a different diminutive marker or collective marker than a noun in declension 2). Are there any languages that do something like this?
User avatar
gestaltist
mayan
mayan
Posts: 1705
Joined: Wed 11 Feb 2015, 11:23

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by gestaltist » Tue 14 Aug 2018, 07:29

this_is_an_account wrote:
Tue 14 Aug 2018, 05:40
Hello! This is my first question here. I have an idea for noun declensions that don't change the inflexional affixes of nouns (so a noun in declension 1 would take identical case markings and number markings as a noun in declension 2), but instead would affect what derivational markings a noun got (so a noun in declension 1 would take a different diminutive marker or collective marker than a noun in declension 2). Are there any languages that do something like this?
I haven't heard of any language that'd do something like this. That said, I don't see why not - but I wouldn't call those declensions. The divide here would likely be semantic-based (perhaps gender?).
Porphyrogenitos
sinic
sinic
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat 21 Jul 2012, 07:01
Location: Buffalo, NY

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Porphyrogenitos » Tue 14 Aug 2018, 13:21

English does various things like this with different derivational endings - some can't be applied to just any word, and sometimes there are two with equivalent meaning that attach to words under different phonological or semantic conditions. E.g. (I can't think of a really good example offhand) we have China > Chinese, but no China > Chinan - and in fact I would say that "Chinan" is disallowed. It's not always hard-and-fast, though. So yeah I'd say this is possible, but I wouldn't call it "declension" since that's generally about inflection. Maybe call them "derivational classes"?
User avatar
Omzinesý
mayan
mayan
Posts: 2444
Joined: Fri 27 Aug 2010, 07:17
Location: nowhere [naʊhɪɚ]

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Omzinesý » Tue 14 Aug 2018, 13:28

gestaltist wrote:
Tue 14 Aug 2018, 07:29
this_is_an_account wrote:
Tue 14 Aug 2018, 05:40
Hello! This is my first question here. I have an idea for noun declensions that don't change the inflexional affixes of nouns (so a noun in declension 1 would take identical case markings and number markings as a noun in declension 2), but instead would affect what derivational markings a noun got (so a noun in declension 1 would take a different diminutive marker or collective marker than a noun in declension 2). Are there any languages that do something like this?
I haven't heard of any language that'd do something like this. That said, I don't see why not - but I wouldn't call those declensions. The divide here would likely be semantic-based (perhaps gender?).
As far as I know, declension means an inflectional paradigm of nouns. But of course there are different kinds of stems for attaching derivational endings.
this_is_an_account
hieroglyphic
hieroglyphic
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue 14 Aug 2018, 05:33

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by this_is_an_account » Tue 14 Aug 2018, 18:04

Derivational class is probably the best name for it, and since I do happen to have grammatical gender, I'll base it off of that. Also, would it be weird for some nouns to be irregular and take some or all of their derivational affixes from a different class? How about some derivations applying to all nouns regardless of gender?
User avatar
eldin raigmore
fire
fire
Posts: 6186
Joined: Sat 14 Aug 2010, 18:38
Location: SouthEast Michigan

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by eldin raigmore » Tue 14 Aug 2018, 18:44

this_is_an_account wrote:
Tue 14 Aug 2018, 18:04
Derivational class is probably the best name for it, and since I do happen to have grammatical gender, I'll base it off of that. Also, would it be weird for some nouns to be irregular and take some or all of their derivational affixes from a different class? How about some derivations applying to all nouns regardless of gender?
IMO all of that would be realistic and naturalistic.
User avatar
QuantumWraith
sinic
sinic
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue 20 Mar 2012, 22:46

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by QuantumWraith » Wed 15 Aug 2018, 03:10

In a language with a phonetic inventory of [m m̥ n n̥ t tʰ k kʰ s h l l̥ r r̥ j j̥ w w̥] in which all sequences are phonetically CV, is it more appropriate to analyze a sequence such as [m̥a] as /m̥a/ or /mha/? Perhaps more to the root of my question is: must a language have clusters of some consonant plus some approximant before it can be considered to have clusters at all?
"Peace...? No peace!"
User avatar
eldin raigmore
fire
fire
Posts: 6186
Joined: Sat 14 Aug 2010, 18:38
Location: SouthEast Michigan

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by eldin raigmore » Wed 15 Aug 2018, 03:22

QuantumWraith wrote:
Wed 15 Aug 2018, 03:10
In a language with a phonetic inventory of [m m̥ n n̥ t tʰ k kʰ s h l l̥ r r̥ j j̥ w w̥] in which all sequences are phonetically CV, is it more appropriate to analyze a sequence such as [m̥a] as /m̥a/ or /mha/? Perhaps more to the root of my question is: must a language have clusters of some consonant plus some approximant before it can be considered to have clusters at all?
I’m pretty sure that’s for you to say.
We won’t know until you tell us.
User avatar
Shemtov
runic
runic
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon 29 Apr 2013, 03:06

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Shemtov » Wed 15 Aug 2018, 03:55

Ælfwine wrote:
Tue 14 Aug 2018, 03:47
Shemtov wrote:
Tue 14 Aug 2018, 03:04
Would an althistory where the Romans conquered part of Ireland, which had or has a Romance language competing in those parts with Gaelic work?
I don't see why not. OTL the Irish were very much influenced by Rome, even though they never spoke Latin.
Are people willing to do a collablang of this? I want this, but I can't do a full a posteriori conlang without going nuts/ overestimating/ underestimating the change.
Many children make up, or begin to make up, imaginary languages. I have been at it since I could write.
-JRR Tolkien
User avatar
Dormouse559
moderator
moderator
Posts: 2637
Joined: Sat 10 Nov 2012, 20:52
Location: California

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Dormouse559 » Wed 15 Aug 2018, 04:01

QuantumWraith wrote:
Wed 15 Aug 2018, 03:10
In a language with a phonetic inventory of [m m̥ n n̥ t tʰ k kʰ s h l l̥ r r̥ j j̥ w w̥] in which all sequences are phonetically CV, is it more appropriate to analyze a sequence such as [m̥a] as /m̥a/ or /mha/? Perhaps more to the root of my question is: must a language have clusters of some consonant plus some approximant before it can be considered to have clusters at all?
The answer to the root of your question is no. A language must have clusters of some consonant and some consonant to have clusters. The exact natures of these consonants are unimportant on a non-language-specific level. That said, there may be some combinations that are considered consonant clusters in some languages but not in others, depending on the details of the phonology (Is [tj] a consonant cluster or a consonant followed by a semivowel?).

Your question on [m̥a] is difficult to answer without more information. Does [m̥] only emerge from a sequence of [m] and [h]? If so, the /mh/ analysis makes more sense. If [m̥] can also appear in other contexts, it is probably better analyzed as its own phoneme, /m̥/.
User avatar
Pabappa
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat 18 Nov 2017, 02:41
Contact:

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Pabappa » Wed 15 Aug 2018, 04:41

I would simplify and just analyze /h/ as an independent part of the syllable. A language with just one type of cluster still has clust3rs. The only asymmetry is /s/ .... was there ever a /sh/?
Image
yangfiretiger121
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun 17 Jun 2018, 02:04

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by yangfiretiger121 » Wed 15 Aug 2018, 14:11

Would dentalization of alveolars, such as /n → n̪/ interfere with the interchangeability of alveolars with retroflexes, such as /n~ɳ/?
Ddoean's document
Paleofonts (for Linear-B characters)
User avatar
Dormouse559
moderator
moderator
Posts: 2637
Joined: Sat 10 Nov 2012, 20:52
Location: California

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Dormouse559 » Wed 15 Aug 2018, 14:41

Pabappa wrote:
Wed 15 Aug 2018, 04:41
I would simplify and just analyze /h/ as an independent part of the syllable. A language with just one type of cluster still has clust3rs. The only asymmetry is /s/ .... was there ever a /sh/?
I interpret the language as having phonemic clusters as well. I took "all sequences are phonetically CV" to allow for the possibility that all phonemic consonant clusters allophonically coalesce.
Ælfwine
greek
greek
Posts: 806
Joined: Mon 21 Sep 2015, 00:28
Location: New Jersey

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Ælfwine » Wed 15 Aug 2018, 15:49

Shemtov wrote:
Wed 15 Aug 2018, 03:55
Ælfwine wrote:
Tue 14 Aug 2018, 03:47
Shemtov wrote:
Tue 14 Aug 2018, 03:04
Would an althistory where the Romans conquered part of Ireland, which had or has a Romance language competing in those parts with Gaelic work?
I don't see why not. OTL the Irish were very much influenced by Rome, even though they never spoke Latin.
Are people willing to do a collablang of this? I want this, but I can't do a full a posteriori conlang without going nuts/ overestimating/ underestimating the change.
I can definitely help.
My Blog
Current Projects:
Mannish — A North Germanic language spoken on the Calf of Man
Pelsodian — A Romance language spoken around Lake Balaton
Jezik Panoski — A Slavic language spoken in the same area
yangfiretiger121
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun 17 Jun 2018, 02:04

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by yangfiretiger121 » Thu 16 Aug 2018, 01:18

Is it acoustically possible to trill /ɕ ʑ/?
Ddoean's document
Paleofonts (for Linear-B characters)
User avatar
Creyeditor
mongolian
mongolian
Posts: 4465
Joined: Tue 14 Aug 2012, 18:32

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Creyeditor » Thu 16 Aug 2018, 12:35

Isn't the second one the Czech r?
Creyeditor
"Thoughts are free."
Produce, Analyze, Manipulate
1 :deu: 2 :eng: 3 :idn: 4 :fra: 4 :esp:
:con: Ook & Omlűt & Nautli languages & Sperenjas
[<3] Papuan languages, Morphophonology, Lexical Semantics [<3]
yangfiretiger121
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun 17 Jun 2018, 02:04

Re: (Conlangs) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by yangfiretiger121 » Thu 16 Aug 2018, 15:27

Wikipedia describes it as "sounding a little like a simultaneous [r] and [ʐ] (or [r̥] and [ʂ] when devoiced)," which means it could be a retroflex (native speaker, please help).

Do I need to include purely allophonic sounds in a language's IPA chart? For example, A'atun's chart currently includes the uvulars (/ɴ/, etc.) but lists them as allophones.
Ddoean's document
Paleofonts (for Linear-B characters)
Post Reply