What did you accomplish today?

A forum for all topics related to constructed languages
User avatar
gestaltist
roman
roman
Posts: 1387
Joined: Wed 11 Feb 2015, 11:23

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by gestaltist » Wed 18 Oct 2017, 09:30

Ahzoh wrote:*sigh* Though my map still looks topgraphically bare compared to that map of the Earth I reference. It seems that most of the Earth is either at sea level or above 500m.
You're fine, most of Russia and Central Europe is below 500m. Unless you don't like it in which case just add an igneous province somewhere.
User avatar
Click
darkness
darkness
Posts: 3328
Joined: Sat 21 Jan 2012, 12:17

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by Click » Wed 18 Oct 2017, 10:00

@kiwikami: I love your work! [:D]

@gestaltist: Glad to see you back!

I have started writing about the place where two of my languages are spoken. This falls under worldbuilding rather than making languages, but I thought it was worth posting here. There's only basic historical stuff as of now, but I hope to start writing about culture soon.

Thoughts and comments appreciated.
Iyionaku
roman
roman
Posts: 1414
Joined: Sun 25 May 2014, 13:17

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by Iyionaku » Wed 18 Oct 2017, 10:11

Ahzoh wrote:*sigh* Though my map still looks topgraphically bare compared to that map of the Earth I reference. It seems that most of the Earth is either at sea level or above 500m.
It's fine I guess. Just keep in mind that large, flat areas usually facilitate the spread of only few languages and deteriorate the change for smaller languages to survive.
Heaven and Earth, but I feel the color of the cake when you keep the Victoria.
I had a mantra on the moss and I had to go to bed.


Oh, and there is a [ɕ] in my name!
User avatar
Ahzoh
korean
korean
Posts: 5961
Joined: Sun 20 Oct 2013, 01:57
Location: Tom-ʾEzru lit Yat-Vṛḵažu

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by Ahzoh » Wed 18 Oct 2017, 17:49

Iyionaku wrote:
Ahzoh wrote:*sigh* Though my map still looks topgraphically bare compared to that map of the Earth I reference. It seems that most of the Earth is either at sea level or above 500m.
It's fine I guess. Just keep in mind that large, flat areas usually facilitate the spread of only few languages and deteriorate the change for smaller languages to survive.
Eh? You're saying there will be less languages and they'll change slower?
Image Ӯсцӣ (Onschen) [ CWS ]
Image ʾEšd Yatvṛḵažaẇ (Vrkhazhian) [ WIKI | CWS ]
User avatar
Thrice Xandvii
darkness
darkness
Posts: 3590
Joined: Sun 25 Nov 2012, 10:13
Location: Carnassus

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by Thrice Xandvii » Fri 20 Oct 2017, 00:42

I coined some new words/characters late last night early this AM. they are related in structure: one is for the verb "to sleep" and the other is for the noun "night, darkness." The second character, when it is used with a different classifier, takes on the meaning of "fear" instead. I like the idea of characters having different but somewhat related meanings based on classifier, or something similar. Also, most characters serve double duty as both nouns and verbs and depend on context.
Image
User avatar
Frislander
mayan
mayan
Posts: 2055
Joined: Sat 14 May 2016, 17:47
Location: The North

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by Frislander » Sat 21 Oct 2017, 15:14

Ahzoh wrote:
Iyionaku wrote:
Ahzoh wrote:*sigh* Though my map still looks topgraphically bare compared to that map of the Earth I reference. It seems that most of the Earth is either at sea level or above 500m.
It's fine I guess. Just keep in mind that large, flat areas usually facilitate the spread of only few languages and deteriorate the change for smaller languages to survive.
Eh? You're saying there will be less languages and they'll change slower?
That latter is a typo, it clearly should be "chance", but for the first point yes, since flatter topography encourages mobility and nomadism, both of which result in a lower population density and hence fewer languages.
Iyionaku
roman
roman
Posts: 1414
Joined: Sun 25 May 2014, 13:17

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by Iyionaku » Sun 22 Oct 2017, 15:53

Exactly, it should be "chance" like Frislander said. Sorry for creating confusion.
Heaven and Earth, but I feel the color of the cake when you keep the Victoria.
I had a mantra on the moss and I had to go to bed.


Oh, and there is a [ɕ] in my name!
User avatar
Ahzoh
korean
korean
Posts: 5961
Joined: Sun 20 Oct 2013, 01:57
Location: Tom-ʾEzru lit Yat-Vṛḵažu

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by Ahzoh » Sun 22 Oct 2017, 18:08

Frislander wrote:
Ahzoh wrote:
Iyionaku wrote:
Ahzoh wrote:*sigh* Though my map still looks topgraphically bare compared to that map of the Earth I reference. It seems that most of the Earth is either at sea level or above 500m.
It's fine I guess. Just keep in mind that large, flat areas usually facilitate the spread of only few languages and deteriorate the change for smaller languages to survive.
Eh? You're saying there will be less languages and they'll change slower?
That latter is a typo, it clearly should be "chance", but for the first point yes, since flatter topography encourages mobility and nomadism, both of which result in a lower population density and hence fewer languages.
Well all the areas indicated as grayish-brownish are not quite a flat plain as there is still potentially 300m of difference in elevation.
Image Ӯсцӣ (Onschen) [ CWS ]
Image ʾEšd Yatvṛḵažaẇ (Vrkhazhian) [ WIKI | CWS ]
User avatar
Fluffy8x
rupestrian
rupestrian
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2014, 05:38
Contact:

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by Fluffy8x » Mon 23 Oct 2017, 02:50

Image

Fontifying a script for Lek-Tsaro. These are consonant pairs, and most of them were auto-generated by a script.

Right now, I'm having trouble with vowel diacritics. Not only are there a whopping 143 of them, but LibreOffice seems to clip them. I changed the ascender height from 800 to 1000 to adjust and put the diacritic in the y=800 to 1000 range, but that was to no avail.

If it helps, I'm using FontForge. If any of you want to help, I can send the .sfd file.

Edit: derp, turns out I had a copy of the font in both ~/.local/share/fonts and /usr/share/fonts. I was using a command to copy the .otf files into the latter location, but LibreOffice was reading from the former.
an siina levian t'isorakateez
User avatar
lsd
greek
greek
Posts: 815
Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2011, 21:11

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by lsd » Mon 23 Oct 2017, 20:20

Thrice Xandvii wrote:I coined some new words/characters late last night early this AM. they are related in structure: one is for the verb "to sleep"
Does coining sleep work better than counting sheeps...
Last edited by lsd on Tue 24 Oct 2017, 06:20, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Thrice Xandvii
darkness
darkness
Posts: 3590
Joined: Sun 25 Nov 2012, 10:13
Location: Carnassus

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by Thrice Xandvii » Mon 23 Oct 2017, 22:21

Huh!?
Image
User avatar
Dormouse559
moderator
moderator
Posts: 2369
Joined: Sat 10 Nov 2012, 20:52
Location: California

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by Dormouse559 » Tue 24 Oct 2017, 23:34

I figured out the Silvish word for "hot", which turns out to be hòt /ˈhɔt/. [:P] It has other forms, but if you want to say a man is feverish, sexy or horny, that's the one you should go with.
User avatar
ixals
sinic
sinic
Posts: 225
Joined: Tue 28 Jul 2015, 17:43

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by ixals » Wed 25 Oct 2017, 00:40

Dormouse559 wrote:I figured out the Silvish word for "hot", which turns out to be hòt /ˈhɔt/. [:P] It has other forms, but if you want to say a man is feverish, sexy or horny, that's the one you should go with.
Oooh, what's the etymology for that if I may ask? [:D]
Native: :deu:
Learning: :gbr:, :fra:, :por:, :pol:

Цiски a Central Slavic conlang
Noattȯč a future German conlang [on hold]
Tungōnis Vīdīnōs Proto-Germanic goes Romance [on hold]
User avatar
Dormouse559
moderator
moderator
Posts: 2369
Joined: Sat 10 Nov 2012, 20:52
Location: California

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by Dormouse559 » Wed 25 Oct 2017, 01:27

ixals wrote:Oooh, what's the etymology for that if I may ask? [:D]
Latin calidus, as it happens, which is part of what surprised me.
User avatar
Ælfwine
greek
greek
Posts: 585
Joined: Mon 21 Sep 2015, 00:28
Location: Canada

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by Ælfwine » Wed 25 Oct 2017, 02:08

Dormouse559 wrote:
ixals wrote:Oooh, what's the etymology for that if I may ask? [:D]
Latin calidus, as it happens, which is part of what surprised me.
I am curious how you got "hòt" from that.
The worst thing you can do to an idea is forget about it.
User avatar
ixals
sinic
sinic
Posts: 225
Joined: Tue 28 Jul 2015, 17:43

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by ixals » Wed 25 Oct 2017, 02:14

Ælfwine wrote:I am curious how you got "hòt" from that.
I bet it's "'ka.li.dum > 'kʰaɫ.do > 'xawt > 'hɔt".

Is Silvish #k > h a regularly change? It's definitely a new one, I don't remember seeing it before. But "hòt" sounds very unique though!
Native: :deu:
Learning: :gbr:, :fra:, :por:, :pol:

Цiски a Central Slavic conlang
Noattȯč a future German conlang [on hold]
Tungōnis Vīdīnōs Proto-Germanic goes Romance [on hold]
User avatar
Dormouse559
moderator
moderator
Posts: 2369
Joined: Sat 10 Nov 2012, 20:52
Location: California

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by Dormouse559 » Wed 25 Oct 2017, 02:30

ixals wrote:
Ælfwine wrote:I am curious how you got "hòt" from that.
I bet it's "'ka.li.dum > 'kʰaɫ.do > 'xawt > 'hɔt".
Not quite. This form comes from the nominative masculine singular.
ixals wrote:Is Silvish #k > h a regularly change? It's definitely a new one, I don't remember seeing it before. But "hòt" sounds very unique though!
There is a regular change, but it's k > h / _a. It corresponds to French k > ʃ / _a. The result of the change is new, but it's been there in some form for a while. I'll unpack it below.

The sound changes go something like this (starting from Vulgar Latin). The exact order might end up being a little different, but the result should be the same.

ˈkaldos > ˈkalts > ˈtɕalts > ˈtɕalt > ˈɕalt > ˈɕawt > ˈɕɔt > ˈhɔt
User avatar
Ælfwine
greek
greek
Posts: 585
Joined: Mon 21 Sep 2015, 00:28
Location: Canada

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by Ælfwine » Wed 25 Oct 2017, 03:05

Dormouse559 wrote:
ixals wrote:
Ælfwine wrote:I am curious how you got "hòt" from that.
I bet it's "'ka.li.dum > 'kʰaɫ.do > 'xawt > 'hɔt".
Not quite. This form comes from the nominative masculine singular.
ixals wrote:Is Silvish #k > h a regularly change? It's definitely a new one, I don't remember seeing it before. But "hòt" sounds very unique though!
There is a regular change, but it's k > h / _a. It corresponds to French k > ʃ / _a. The result of the change is new, but it's been there in some form for a while. I'll unpack it below.

The sound changes go something like this (starting from Vulgar Latin). The exact order might end up being a little different, but the result should be the same.

ˈkaldos > ˈkalts > ˈtɕalts > ˈtɕalt > ˈɕalt > ˈɕawt > ˈɕɔt > ˈhɔt
Would never have guessed.

Is this word normally derived from the nominative? I have [cç] where you have [h] it seems. (This word appears to be "tyalc" in my Pannonian Romance.)
The worst thing you can do to an idea is forget about it.
User avatar
Dormouse559
moderator
moderator
Posts: 2369
Joined: Sat 10 Nov 2012, 20:52
Location: California

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by Dormouse559 » Wed 25 Oct 2017, 03:19

Ælfwine wrote:Is this word normally derived from the nominative?
Hmm, I'm not sure if you're asking about Silvish or Romance languages generally. Well, in Silvish most inherited adjectives derive their forms from the nominative, accusative and dative. In modern Romance languages, the word form comes from the accusative, but looking back, Old French and Old Provençal maintained the Latin nominative alongside the accusative.
Ælfwine wrote:I have [cç] where you have [h] it seems. (This word appears to be "tyalc" in my Pannonian Romance.)
Ah, okay. What does the <c> represent?
User avatar
Ælfwine
greek
greek
Posts: 585
Joined: Mon 21 Sep 2015, 00:28
Location: Canada

Re: What did you accomplish today?

Post by Ælfwine » Wed 25 Oct 2017, 03:31

Dormouse559 wrote:Hmm, I'm not sure if you're asking about Silvish or Romance languages generally. Well, in Silvish most inherited adjectives derive their forms from the nominative, accusative and dative.
All three? Interesting.
Dormouse559 wrote:In modern Romance languages, the word form comes from the accusative, but looking back, Old French and Old Provençal maintained the Latin nominative alongside the accusative.
Okay, good to know. Then I guess my form shouldn't be tyalc but tyald [ˈcaɫd].
Dormouse559 wrote:Ah, okay. What does the <c> represent?
It is [t͡s] like in many Slavic languages, and Hungarian.
The worst thing you can do to an idea is forget about it.
Post Reply