(L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

A forum for discussing linguistics or just languages in general.
User avatar
Aszev
admin
admin
Posts: 1473
Joined: Tue 11 May 2010, 04:46
Location: Upp.
Contact:

(L&N) Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Aszev » Thu 19 Aug 2010, 20:06

This thread is for quick questions related to the forum topic; Post your question and hopefully receive an answer here.
Sound change works in mysterious ways.

Image CE
User avatar
Maximillian
light
light
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2010, 19:33
Location: Israel
Contact:

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Maximillian » Mon 30 Aug 2010, 17:59

In my conlang there is no morphological distinction between adjectives and adverbs. So, my question is, how to call a word that is both an adjective and an adverb?
UNUS•ET•UNICUS
User avatar
LetoAtreides
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat 14 Aug 2010, 12:09

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by LetoAtreides » Mon 30 Aug 2010, 18:32

An adjective.
Spoiler:
In Nolikan, there is no distinction between not only adjectives and adverbs, but also nouns. I call them all nouns, they have however an adverbial case. You may want to introduce such a case into your conlang.
User avatar
Maximillian
light
light
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2010, 19:33
Location: Israel
Contact:

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Maximillian » Mon 30 Aug 2010, 19:27

LetoAtreides wrote:An adjective.
Nah, there must be something more interesting! :mrgreen: Qualifier, maybe?
LetoAtreides wrote:In Nolikan, there is no distinction between not only adjectives and adverbs, but also nouns. I call them all nouns, they have however an adverbial case. You may want to introduce such a case into your conlang.
Hmm... What does cat+adverbial-case mean? "In a cat-like manner"? I don't think there is such a thing, cause it's just an adverb that way.
UNUS•ET•UNICUS
User avatar
LetoAtreides
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat 14 Aug 2010, 12:09

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by LetoAtreides » Mon 30 Aug 2010, 19:59

Maximillian wrote:
LetoAtreides wrote:In Nolikan, there is no distinction between not only adjectives and adverbs, but also nouns. I call them all nouns, they have however an adverbial case. You may want to introduce such a case into your conlang.
Hmm... What does cat+adverbial-case mean? "In a cat-like manner"?
Yes.

There are also natlangs with an adverbial case.
reizoukin
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2010, 08:18

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by reizoukin » Wed 01 Sep 2010, 13:01

Maximillian wrote:
LetoAtreides wrote:An adjective.
Nah, there must be something more interesting! :mrgreen: Qualifier, maybe?
I've always heard it called a modifier. Because it modifies.
:eng: Native | :esp: Almost Fluent | :zho: Intermediate | :ara: :fra: Interested | :kat: :cym: Very interested.
User avatar
masako
shadowlight
shadowlight
Posts: 1863
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2010, 15:42
Location: 가매
Contact:

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by masako » Mon 06 Sep 2010, 01:14

I am looking for any and all relevant information to the Ancient Egyptian language. Scholarly/Academic is preferable, please.

Thank you.

I also accept PM's.
User avatar
Maximillian
light
light
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2010, 19:33
Location: Israel
Contact:

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Maximillian » Mon 06 Sep 2010, 19:32

UNUS•ET•UNICUS
User avatar
Maximillian
light
light
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2010, 19:33
Location: Israel
Contact:

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Maximillian » Wed 08 Sep 2010, 19:32

About possession. On Wikipedia it says that "The Yabem language of Papua New Guinea, for instance, distinguishes alienable from inalienable possession when the possessor is human, but distinguishes inherent from non-inherent possession when the 'possessor' is not human." What is this inherent vs. non-inherent possession, and how it differs from alienable vs. inalienable?
UNUS•ET•UNICUS
User avatar
Sankon
sinic
sinic
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2010, 01:06
Location: At the computer

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Sankon » Sun 12 Sep 2010, 15:17

Alienable vs. inalienable (A-I) possession depends on whether the possessed item will stay possessed by the possessor or will later be somehow unpossessed.

Inherent vs. non-inherent (I-NI) possession depends on whether the possessed item is a part of the possessor or not.

Take the sentence "I will have my dog forever." If you are distinguishing between A-I, "my dog" would probably be inalienable, since the sentence is trying to convey how the dog will never be away from you, and thus be inalienable.

But if you are distinguishing between I-NI, "my dog" would probably be non-inherent, as the dog is not inherently a part of you. If you had the sentence "I petted the dog with my hand", "my hand" would be inherent, as a hand is inherently a part of the speaker's body (assuming that the speaker has hands, of course).

You could say A-I depends on whether or not the possessed item will not be there in the future, whereas I-NI depends on whether or not the possessed item was there since the beginning.
User avatar
MrKrov
cleardarkness
cleardarkness
Posts: 2414
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2010, 01:47
Location: /ai/ > /a:/
Contact:

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by MrKrov » Mon 13 Sep 2010, 04:14

What Proto-Indo-European root would Sanskrit vāṭa derive from?
User avatar
sangi39
moderator
moderator
Posts: 2625
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2010, 00:53
Location: North Yorkshire, UK

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by sangi39 » Tue 14 Sep 2010, 11:51

MrKrov wrote:What Proto-Indo-European root would Sanskrit vāṭa derive from?
I could be completely wrong about this and it's just a guess but could it possibly come from *worto/eh2-. It's the o-grade form of *wr.to/eh2 which Sanskrit v.rti (enclosure) comes from and since vāṭa also means "enclosure", at least according to Wiktionary, it seems possible. IIRC the regular outcome (*rt becoming a retroflex ṭ and the first *o merging into *a: in the new open syllable) but again, I could be wrong. I'm not great with Sanskrit-related stuff.
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
User avatar
MrKrov
cleardarkness
cleardarkness
Posts: 2414
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2010, 01:47
Location: /ai/ > /a:/
Contact:

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by MrKrov » Tue 14 Sep 2010, 17:15

'k. It's a start. Thanks.
User avatar
Maximillian
light
light
Posts: 667
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2010, 19:33
Location: Israel
Contact:

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Maximillian » Tue 14 Sep 2010, 19:13

Is there an example of a language that had definite article, but it fell out of use?
UNUS•ET•UNICUS
User avatar
Czwartek
greek
greek
Posts: 453
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2010, 14:50

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by Czwartek » Wed 15 Sep 2010, 12:54

Is there a European language which has uvular stops?
User avatar
MrKrov
cleardarkness
cleardarkness
Posts: 2414
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2010, 01:47
Location: /ai/ > /a:/
Contact:

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by MrKrov » Wed 15 Sep 2010, 14:44

No.
User avatar
masako
shadowlight
shadowlight
Posts: 1863
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2010, 15:42
Location: 가매
Contact:

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by masako » Wed 15 Sep 2010, 19:44

MrKrov wrote:No.
Wrong.

Firstly, which languages are considered "European"?

Chechen has /q/.
User avatar
MrKrov
cleardarkness
cleardarkness
Posts: 2414
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2010, 01:47
Location: /ai/ > /a:/
Contact:

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by MrKrov » Wed 15 Sep 2010, 20:00

Wrong again. Isn't that just the easiest thing to do? Buy a geography book.
User avatar
masako
shadowlight
shadowlight
Posts: 1863
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2010, 15:42
Location: 가매
Contact:

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by masako » Thu 16 Sep 2010, 01:18

If you consider Chechnya to be in Europe ((most people do) Southeast to be exact), then you answered the question "Is there a European language which has uvular stops?" incorrectly.

Accept it and move on.
User avatar
MrKrov
cleardarkness
cleardarkness
Posts: 2414
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2010, 01:47
Location: /ai/ > /a:/
Contact:

Re: Q&A Thread - Quick questions go here

Post by MrKrov » Thu 16 Sep 2010, 02:27

And I don't. So I didn't. So suck it.
Post Reply