Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Discussions about constructed worlds, cultures and any topics related to constructed societies.
User avatar
qwed117
mongolian
mongolian
Posts: 4400
Joined: 20 Nov 2014 02:27

Re: Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Post by qwed117 » 05 Oct 2017 23:23

elemtilas wrote:
gestaltist wrote:Yes! I get bored or dissatisfied way too easily. I often get discouraged to the point of not doing any creative work for months but I always come back to the "secret vice".
Good to see you back from your long wanderings, gestaltist!
[+1] [+1][+1][+1] [+1] [+1] [+1] [+1]
Spoiler:
My minicity is Zyphrazia and Novland
What is made of man will crumble away.

User avatar
gestaltist
mayan
mayan
Posts: 1715
Joined: 11 Feb 2015 11:23

Re: Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Post by gestaltist » 06 Oct 2017 09:58

qwed117 wrote:
elemtilas wrote:
gestaltist wrote:Yes! I get bored or dissatisfied way too easily. I often get discouraged to the point of not doing any creative work for months but I always come back to the "secret vice".
Good to see you back from your long wanderings, gestaltist!
[+1] [+1][+1][+1] [+1] [+1] [+1] [+1]
Thanks guys. I wouldn't say I'm back-back. My recent visit to the Louvre has rekindled my interest in conculturing, though. Will probably end in another unfinished and unpublished sketch...

User avatar
Egerius
mayan
mayan
Posts: 2412
Joined: 12 Sep 2013 20:29
Location: Not Rodentèrra
Contact:

Re: Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Post by Egerius » 06 Oct 2017 11:15

Now we know how it works: Say conworlding is bunk, gestaltist appears.
Languages of Rodentèrra: Buonavallese, Saselvan Argemontese; Wīlandisċ Taulkeisch; More on the road.
Conlang embryo of TELES: Proto-Avesto-Umbric ~> Proto-Umbric
New blog: http://argentiusbonavalensis.tumblr.com

User avatar
DesEsseintes
cleardarkness
cleardarkness
Posts: 4651
Joined: 31 Mar 2013 12:16

Re: Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Post by DesEsseintes » 06 Oct 2017 11:38

Egerius wrote:Now we know how it works: Say conworlding is bunk, gestaltist appears.
Conworlding is bunk
Conworlding is bunk
Conworlding is bunk
...

User avatar
gestaltist
mayan
mayan
Posts: 1715
Joined: 11 Feb 2015 11:23

Re: Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Post by gestaltist » 06 Oct 2017 12:50

DesEsseintes wrote:
Egerius wrote:Now we know how it works: Say conworlding is bunk, gestaltist appears.
Conworlding is bunk
Conworlding is bunk
Conworlding is bunk
...
It's not true at al... wait...

User avatar
eldin raigmore
fire
fire
Posts: 6232
Joined: 14 Aug 2010 18:38
Location: SouthEast Michigan

Re: Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Post by eldin raigmore » 06 Oct 2017 23:12

gestaltist wrote:
DesEsseintes wrote:
Egerius wrote:Now we know how it works: Say conworlding is bunk, gestaltist appears.
Conworlding is bunk
Conworlding is bunk
Conworlding is bunk
...
It's not true at al... wait...
Don't you have to look in a mirror in a darkish room while saying it?

User avatar
Pabappa
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 198
Joined: 18 Nov 2017 02:41
Contact:

Re: Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Post by Pabappa » 20 Nov 2017 20:15

Everything I've ever written is canon, at least metaphorically. From when I was 3 yrs old to my early twenties, I mostly wrote about space. So e.g. the spaceships have become boats, the aliens have become animals, (I still have sentient/sapient animals) and cities of millions have become towns of thousands.

Some individual characters have become deities, others remain as people, and others do not appear at all (everything is canon but not everything is interesting enough to be worth mentioning).

My childhood conworld is still alive privately, but I never post about it here or elsewhere on in the internet, and have removed mentions even from frathwiki. It uses the same conlangs as my newer, smaller conworld, even though this is a logical paradox... My standards were much lower when I was younger.
Image

User avatar
elemtilas
runic
runic
Posts: 3224
Joined: 22 Nov 2014 04:48

Re: Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Post by elemtilas » 21 Nov 2017 00:15

Pabappa wrote:
20 Nov 2017 20:15
Everything I've ever written is canon, at least metaphorically. From when I was 3 yrs old to my early twenties, I mostly wrote about space. So e.g. the spaceships have become boats, the aliens have become animals, (I still have sentient/sapient animals) and cities of millions have become towns of thousands.

Some individual characters have become deities, others remain as people, and others do not appear at all (everything is canon but not everything is interesting enough to be worth mentioning).

My childhood conworld is still alive privately, but I never post about it here or elsewhere on in the internet, and have removed mentions even from frathwiki. It uses the same conlangs as my newer, smaller conworld, even though this is a logical paradox... My standards were much lower when I was younger.
Oo, someone with who I share the same yacht of extreme longevity of canon! Though for me it's probably about 7 or 8 and into the forseeable future. I've only rarely written anything set in Space; but I fully commiserate as regards old things becoming other things and ancient factoids remaining in place and the whole ancient inner world still being alive and active thing!!

I don't know if Lambuzhao or Lao Kou or some of the other, er, more seasoned geopoets have been working on one world the whole time or not. I think Sally Caves is probably the only other person I know who's been working within a single world for a span of decades.
Image

If we stuff the whole chicken back into the egg, will all our problems go away? --- Wandalf of Angera

User avatar
sangi39
moderator
moderator
Posts: 3135
Joined: 12 Aug 2010 00:53
Location: North Yorkshire, UK

Re: Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Post by sangi39 » 21 Nov 2017 01:09

I don't get bored, strictly speaking, but I do get bogged down a lot in stuff that I just don't understand, or have a limited ability to use certain tools to anywhere near a decent enough level to create anything that looks good and detailed (like rivers or altitude maps). I opted for creating a conworld from the ground up, so I started with tectonics, then moved on to atmospheric and oceanic currents, then on to climate, and that took a fair bit of reading because I actually don't have much experience dealing with those topics.

Obviously real-life has a way of coming in and ruining progress as well, so it just takes forever to get pretty minimal results.
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.

User avatar
OliveAnne
rupestrian
rupestrian
Posts: 19
Joined: 20 Nov 2017 11:44
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Post by OliveAnne » 01 Dec 2017 13:30

I just started with one conworld and still very interested in and attached to it. I don't know if I ever get bored of it, but I think it could happen as you said. It really depends on your creativity to keep your conworld remain interesting.
Words are capable of making experience more vivid, and also of organizing it. They can scare us, and they can comfort us - Jonathan Safran Foer [tick]

User avatar
Axiem
sinic
sinic
Posts: 394
Joined: 10 Sep 2016 05:56

Re: Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Post by Axiem » 02 Dec 2017 18:37

elemtilas wrote:
21 Nov 2017 00:15
I don't know if Lambuzhao or Lao Kou or some of the other, er, more seasoned geopoets have been working on one world the whole time or not. I think Sally Caves is probably the only other person I know who's been working within a single world for a span of decades.
Depending on how exactly you count it, I've potentially been working on Mto in some fashion for about two decades now. The nature of the universe itself has changed on multiple times during then, and places have changed names and been shifted around. Characters have changed names, but there are several who can directly trace themselves back to then.

It's kind of a ship of Theseus problem, though. If I present a universe/story/characters, and then over time change each thing little by little, until everything's been replaced with something new, is it still the same conworld?
Conworld: Mto
:con: : Kuvian

User avatar
elemtilas
runic
runic
Posts: 3224
Joined: 22 Nov 2014 04:48

Re: Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Post by elemtilas » 03 Dec 2017 01:07

Axiem wrote:
02 Dec 2017 18:37
elemtilas wrote:
21 Nov 2017 00:15
I don't know if Lambuzhao or Lao Kou or some of the other, er, more seasoned geopoets have been working on one world the whole time or not. I think Sally Caves is probably the only other person I know who's been working within a single world for a span of decades.
Depending on how exactly you count it, I've potentially been working on Mto in some fashion for about two decades now. The nature of the universe itself has changed on multiple times during then, and places have changed names and been shifted around. Characters have changed names, but there are several who can directly trace themselves back to then.

It's kind of a ship of Theseus problem, though. If I present a universe/story/characters, and then over time change each thing little by little, until everything's been replaced with something new, is it still the same conworld?
Yes it is! As I recall, Sally's world has evolved in nature, as has mine. Tolkien's as well. For that matter, the same is true of the cultures & histories of the primary world!
Image

If we stuff the whole chicken back into the egg, will all our problems go away? --- Wandalf of Angera

Curlyjimsam
sinic
sinic
Posts: 248
Joined: 01 Sep 2010 14:31
Location: UK

Re: Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Post by Curlyjimsam » 06 Dec 2017 23:51

elemtilas wrote:
21 Nov 2017 00:15
I don't know if Lambuzhao or Lao Kou or some of the other, er, more seasoned geopoets have been working on one world the whole time or not. I think Sally Caves is probably the only other person I know who's been working within a single world for a span of decades.
It's changed very considerably since I started it, but I've been working on my current world in some form or other for around twenty years now, and I don't envisage myself stopping anytime soon. There are still a handful of elements maintained pretty much unchanged from very early on, and others which have altered quite a bit but whose lineage can nevertheless be traced back to the very early days. The most recent form, which retains quite a bit from the version immediately previous, is now 11 years old. I dabble in other projects occasionally, but this one world is very definitely the major one for me: it's many times detailed than any others.
Twitter: @jsbaker750
Website: seven-fifty.net

User avatar
Lao Kou
korean
korean
Posts: 5669
Joined: 25 Nov 2012 10:39
Location: 蘇州/苏州

Re: Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Post by Lao Kou » 07 Dec 2017 07:03

elemtilas wrote:
21 Nov 2017 00:15
I don't know if Lambuzhao or Lao Kou or some of the other, er, more seasoned geopoets have been working on one world the whole time or not. I think Sally Caves is probably the only other person I know who's been working within a single world for a span of decades.

Image
Who you talkin' about "seasoned", elmtilas?

Géarthtörs has always been a rather vague place (albeit whether or here)*, with neat streetcar designs and pubs under spanning welcoming trees. In that sense, it spans decades. However, the lang has always trumped my being able to speak it over setting. Some places have since gained placenames, but the general cultural outline remains an Oriental-Occidental smish-smash (and it wouldn't involve Hello Kitty). I'd rather try to speak it and see where it takes me. And it that sense, it has spanned.

*I believe Sally Caves' world has the luxury of fazing in and out of the Black Sea at will. Géarthtörs also exists here (in this kind of dimension), staked out in the Sea of Japan, but has a Zelig-ish presence on twentieth-century history.
道可道,非常道
名可名,非常名

User avatar
marvelous
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 146
Joined: 26 Jun 2016 10:34

Re: Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Post by marvelous » 30 Dec 2017 11:09

I start far more conworlds than I ever work into any sort of detailed form. My most fleshed-out conworld to date, Hkad/Tes Las, is unusual in that I've been developing it for over a year. The frustrating part about getting a conworld down in a more detailed form is that sometimes I want to start over with a new world, and I try to, but it's frustrating or doesn't work out the way I hoped and i just go back to my usual one.
:heb: I have gained self-respect and left. :yid:

User avatar
fruityloops
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 81
Joined: 04 Oct 2017 03:09

Re: Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Post by fruityloops » 11 Jan 2018 17:38

i'm not very good at keeping track with my worlds so at times i may jump back and forth to the world i like to talk about the most.

User avatar
Adarain
greek
greek
Posts: 664
Joined: 03 Jul 2015 14:36
Location: Switzerland, usually

Re: Does anybody else get bored of conworlds easily?

Post by Adarain » 11 Jan 2018 17:56

I used to have that problem; now I kinda have the opposite where I never feel like working on new stuff (even though it would be interesting) and would rather just go back and add details to Mesak and its world.
At kveldi skal dag lęyfa,
Konu es bręnnd es,
Mæki es ręyndr es,
Męy es gefin es,
Ís es yfir kømr,
Ǫl es drukkit es.

Post Reply