ROMANGLIC FILE

In anderen Sprachen · Dans d'autres langues · En otras lenguas · På andra språk
На других языках · Muilla kielillä · その他の言語で · 用别的语言 · Á öðrum málum
User avatar
Lambuzhao
earth
earth
Posts: 7643
Joined: 13 May 2012 01:57

ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by Lambuzhao » 19 Jan 2015 02:52

Congregate, congregate, this the very place of Romanglican provenance. Tis due of participants in equal measure to eradicate Anglican from verbiage, language & discourse the frequency tantamount & equal to maximum possibility, no matter the difficulty, & with grand pains permit us to assay.
Spoiler:
Sounds like bad Shakespeare, instead of the Bad Beowulf at the other thread [B)]
Admittedly a substantial, perchance herculean, challenge at the very minimum.
Spoiler:
Ach, mein lieber! Still way too many Germanic monosyllabic kobolds running amok. Good luck, folks!
May fortune favor {your} Mercies and Graces!

User avatar
Lambuzhao
earth
earth
Posts: 7643
Joined: 13 May 2012 01:57

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by Lambuzhao » 19 Jan 2015 02:56

Ego assures (your) Mercies and Graces, the stated exercise pains my cerebrum, & not in a gentle manner & pleasantry equal to anterior language construction in alternate files.
[D;]

User avatar
Dezinaa
roman
roman
Posts: 908
Joined: 13 Oct 2013 19:33
Location: tunta, àn paànmúnu’ai

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by Dezinaa » 19 Jan 2015 03:07

Salutations, acquaintances! I anticipate to continue these forum posts, & to not be unsuccesful.

User avatar
Lambuzhao
earth
earth
Posts: 7643
Joined: 13 May 2012 01:57

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by Lambuzhao » 19 Jan 2015 03:29

In anticipation of a future desire of philhellenes to gain a vista of :ell: hellenglic, I grant & publish these for collective analysis & delectation :

http://www.structuralintegrity.eu/esis/ ... outos2.pdf

http://www.explorecrete.com/various/greek-zolotas.htm


& in addition, a melody containing verses in hellespanic language:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5h3P-WclRSo

[<3] :mrgreen:

User avatar
Lambuzhao
earth
earth
Posts: 7643
Joined: 13 May 2012 01:57

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by Lambuzhao » 19 Jan 2015 03:33

Dezinaa wrote:Salutations, acquaintances! I anticipate to continue these forum posts, & to not be unsuccesful.
Declaim in latin-radical abundance, O Valiant Cyber-Romangle!
Spoiler:
My head is hurting [:'(] and yet I am laughing [xP]

User avatar
Dormouse559
moderator
moderator
Posts: 2653
Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
Location: California

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by Dormouse559 » 19 Jan 2015 03:42

Present topic's creation pleases ego. Per ego's expectations, composing sentences proves difficult &, conversely, amusing.

Dezinaa, ego considers typing "&" - rejecting "and" - quite ingenious. Ego prefers /ɛt/, regarding character pronunciation.

EDIT:
Lambuzhao wrote:Romanglican
Superposed portmanteau evokes unification involving Roman Catholics & Anglicans, secondarily hypothetical language experiments.

User avatar
Lambuzhao
earth
earth
Posts: 7643
Joined: 13 May 2012 01:57

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by Lambuzhao » 19 Jan 2015 04:34

Permit the cornucopia of latin-radical communication to reverberate & resonate, GliroidDLIX!

[:D]

User avatar
Dormouse559
moderator
moderator
Posts: 2653
Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
Location: California

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by Dormouse559 » 19 Jan 2015 05:18

Ego concurs! Vive le romanglais!

Article 1, Universal Human-Entitlements Declaration
Humans, sans exception, natively possess liberty & equality concerning dignity & entitlements. Humans receive reason & conscience &, ideally, exhibit mutual fraternity.

Squall
greek
greek
Posts: 583
Joined: 28 Nov 2013 14:47

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by Squall » 19 Jan 2015 15:17

Ego's suggestion consists in using 'plus' suppressing '&'.

The necessity of exchanging verbs related to essence exists.
English is not my native language. Sorry for any mistakes or lack of knowledge when I discuss this language.
:bra: :mrgreen: | :uk: [:D] | :esp: [:)] | :epo: [:|] | :lat: [:S] | :jpn: [:'(]

User avatar
Dormouse559
moderator
moderator
Posts: 2653
Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
Location: California

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by Dormouse559 » 19 Jan 2015 18:52

Squall wrote:Ego's suggestion consists in using 'plus' suppressing '&'.
Interesting suggestion. [:)]

Article 1, Universal Human-Entitlements Declaration
Humans, sans exception, natively possess liberty plus equality concerning dignity plus entitlements. Humans receive reason plus conscience plus, ideally, exhibit mutual fraternity.


Additionally, mercies plus ego require decisions regarding numbers. Provide ideas plus explain mercy's considerations.

Ego considered appropriating Latin - perchance Greek - numbers. Despite previous statement, ego prefers items Anglic appropriated previously. Certain determiner-number idea provides interesting system.

Anglic = Romanglic
one dog = solo canine
two dogs = canine duo
three dogs = canine trio
four dogs = canine quartet
five dogs = canine quintet
six dogs = canine sextet
seven dogs = canine septet
eight dogs = canine octet
nine dogs = canine nonet
ten dogs = canine decet

twenty dogs = canine vigintet

one hundred dogs = canine century

Expounded idea functions regarding certain numbers. Per contra, numbers resembling 21, 60, plus decimals require hypothetical constructions (twenty-one dogs = canine unetvigintet?). [:S]
Last edited by Dormouse559 on 20 Jan 2015 16:51, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Znex
roman
roman
Posts: 1177
Joined: 12 Aug 2013 13:05
Location: Australia

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by Znex » 20 Jan 2015 11:59

J'ai intuition que nous plus prospérions si simplement nous apprenions français. Ou anglo-normand.
:eng: : [tick] | :grc: :wls: : [:|] | :chn: :isr: : [:S] | :nor: :deu: :rom: :ind: :con: : [:x]
Conlangs: Pofp'ash, Ikwawese, Old Quelgic, Nisukil Pʰakwi, Apsiska

clawgrip
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2399
Joined: 24 Jun 2012 06:33
Location: Tokyo

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by clawgrip » 20 Jan 2015 13:18

Znex wrote:J'ai intuition que nous plus prospérions si simplement nous apprenions français. Ou anglo-normand.
Surely it is a relatively simple affair to converse in Anglican largely unmolested by native vocabulary.

User avatar
Lambuzhao
earth
earth
Posts: 7643
Joined: 13 May 2012 01:57

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by Lambuzhao » 21 Jan 2015 01:36

Dormouse559 wrote:
Additionally, mercies plus ego require decisions regarding numbers. Provide ideas plus explain mercy's considerations.

Ego considered appropriating Latin - perchance Greek - numbers. Despite previous statement, ego prefers items Anglic appropriated previously. Certain determiner-number idea provides interesting system.

Anglic = Romanglic
one dog = solo canine
two dogs = canine duo
three dogs = canine trio
four dogs = canine quartet
five dogs = canine quintet
six dogs = canine sextet
seven dogs = canine septet
eight dogs = canine octet
nine dogs = canine nonet
ten dogs = canine decet
http://www.trumpetherald.com/forum/view ... hp?t=40734

dectet
undectet
duodectet/dozen
one hundred dogs = canine century
Hmmmm...
Expounded idea functions regarding certain numbers. Per contra, numbers resembling 21, 60, plus decimals require hypothetical constructions (twenty-one dogs = canine unetvigintet?). [:S]
Perchance Anglic people count per dozens???

XXI dogs = canine dozen&nonet

User avatar
Dormouse559
moderator
moderator
Posts: 2653
Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
Location: California

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by Dormouse559 » 21 Jan 2015 03:20

Dormouse559 wrote:decet
Lambuzhao wrote:dectet
Apparently, multiple forms exist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decet_(music)

Fortunately, numbers ranging 11-19 pose negligible difficulty.
Dormouse559 wrote:
one hundred dogs = canine century
Hmmmm...
Considering "century" previously signified "100-item collection", plus ego discovers zero evidence confirming "centet"'s existence, ego considers "century" sensical.
Lanbuzhao wrote:Perchance Anglic people count per dozens???

XXI dogs = canine dozen&nonet
Mercy provides intriguing idea.

User avatar
Znex
roman
roman
Posts: 1177
Joined: 12 Aug 2013 13:05
Location: Australia

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by Znex » 21 Jan 2015 03:36

clawgrip wrote:
Znex wrote:J'ai intuition que nous plus prospérions si simplement nous apprenions français. Ou anglo-normand.
Surely it is a relatively simple affair to converse in Anglican largely unmolested by native vocabulary.
Ah, sauf ne complètement pas sans en altérant. Il néamoins est beaucoup de barbares mots, par exemple "it", "is", "to", "in", "-ly", "by", "the", etc. Oui, ils sont petits mots, pourtant ils sont barbares.
:eng: : [tick] | :grc: :wls: : [:|] | :chn: :isr: : [:S] | :nor: :deu: :rom: :ind: :con: : [:x]
Conlangs: Pofp'ash, Ikwawese, Old Quelgic, Nisukil Pʰakwi, Apsiska

User avatar
Dormouse559
moderator
moderator
Posts: 2653
Joined: 10 Nov 2012 20:52
Location: California

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by Dormouse559 » 21 Jan 2015 04:27

Le français n'est pas un bon choix, vu qu'il a lui-même emprunté beaucoup de mots germaniques.

Ego desires removing independent germanic morphemes. Ego accepts dependent morphemes (e.g. -s, -ly, -ed). Complicating previous statement duo, certain items prove ambiguous, "because", per example.

clawgrip
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2399
Joined: 24 Jun 2012 06:33
Location: Tokyo

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by clawgrip » 21 Jan 2015 04:47

Your method, while effectively complete, unfortunately disregards our endeavour to expunge all native vocabulary from Anglican while preserving its vital, ineffable essence. Exclusively employing French is essentially an invalidation of the avocation to which we have directed our labours.

User avatar
Znex
roman
roman
Posts: 1177
Joined: 12 Aug 2013 13:05
Location: Australia

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by Znex » 21 Jan 2015 05:45

Hmm, perchance we could reconstruct an Anglican from Vulgar Latin? Ergo, we would then possess a perfect Anglican Romance language to ordain as ours.
:eng: : [tick] | :grc: :wls: : [:|] | :chn: :isr: : [:S] | :nor: :deu: :rom: :ind: :con: : [:x]
Conlangs: Pofp'ash, Ikwawese, Old Quelgic, Nisukil Pʰakwi, Apsiska

User avatar
qwed117
mongolian
mongolian
Posts: 4400
Joined: 20 Nov 2014 02:27

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by qwed117 » 22 Jan 2015 22:41

Znex wrote:Hmm, perchance we could reconstruct an Anglican from Vulgar Latin? Ergo, we would then possess a perfect Anglican Romance language to ordain as ours.
Magnificent! We could obtain a text to translate into nos language
Spoiler:
My minicity is Zyphrazia and Novland
What is made of man will crumble away.

clawgrip
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2399
Joined: 24 Jun 2012 06:33
Location: Tokyo

Re: ROMANGLIC FILE

Post by clawgrip » 23 Jan 2015 01:47

It is my own personal opinion, but I object to the replacement of pronouns with Latin counterparts.

Post Reply