What would be the best approach for an Antarctic 'lang?

If you're new to these arts, this is the place to ask "stupid" questions and get directions!
Post Reply
GoshDiggityDangit
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 133
Joined: 18 Dec 2018 21:27
Location: Misawa AFB, Aomori, Japan

What would be the best approach for an Antarctic 'lang?

Post by GoshDiggityDangit » 09 Mar 2019 19:48

I have, for a while, been itching to make a conlang for an indigenous people in Antarctica. What I know is that I would like it to be a bit more synthetic than not. What I can't decide on is, whether or not this language should be a-posteriori or a-priori? And if it were to be a-posteriori, what would be related to? I think a-priori might be the way to go, but I would like to tackle an a-posteriori, because I haven't done one in a while.

User avatar
Frislander
runic
runic
Posts: 3496
Joined: 14 May 2016 18:47
Location: The North

Re: What would be the best approach for an Antarctic 'lang?

Post by Frislander » 09 Mar 2019 20:35

Have a watch of this video - essentially the upshot of this is that the native population would most likely be related to the Fuegians, so if you wanted to do a posteriori you'd have to somehow reconstruct some kind of "proto-Fuegian", or at the very least try and back-derive an ancestor from one of the existing Fuegian languages to use.

User avatar
qwed117
mongolian
mongolian
Posts: 4455
Joined: 20 Nov 2014 02:27

Re: What would be the best approach for an Antarctic 'lang?

Post by qwed117 » 09 Mar 2019 21:30

It could be Teheulche or Onan, possibly as well.
Spoiler:
My minicity is Zyphrazia and Novland
What is made of man will crumble away.

User avatar
WeepingElf
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 195
Joined: 23 Feb 2016 18:42
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: What would be the best approach for an Antarctic 'lang?

Post by WeepingElf » 09 Mar 2019 23:14

Yes - your Antarcticans probably arrived from the southern tip of South America, so one may expect their languages to be related to languages spoken there. If you can find documentation of those, that is.

BTW, a guy named Brad Coon has already constructed an Antarctican conlang, but that should not deter you. Rather, you may draw some inspiration from it.
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf

User avatar
Lambuzhao
korean
korean
Posts: 7783
Joined: 13 May 2012 02:57

Re: What would be the best approach for an Antarctic 'lang?

Post by Lambuzhao » 10 Mar 2019 00:31

Although a stretch, possibly include a smattering of Palawa kani (Tasmanian) ¿?
That would be interesting if Tasmanians followed seal-hunting via MacQuarie Island and arrived at Antarctica.

Mebbe Maori ¿¿??

User avatar
WeepingElf
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 195
Joined: 23 Feb 2016 18:42
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: What would be the best approach for an Antarctic 'lang?

Post by WeepingElf » 10 Mar 2019 17:12

Maori would work; they apparently got there, but for understandable reasons did not stay. I have heard of a Maori tale about a sailor venturing south and finding a frozen wasteland.
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf

GoshDiggityDangit
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 133
Joined: 18 Dec 2018 21:27
Location: Misawa AFB, Aomori, Japan

Re: What would be the best approach for an Antarctic 'lang?

Post by GoshDiggityDangit » 10 Mar 2019 17:46

A Fuegian language would be interesting, and would probably be a Chonan language. It would probably be island Chon, so a relative of Ona and Haush. I also like the idea of some Austronesian influence, as the last time I tried making one of these, it was Austronesian. I'm on the bench about Tasmanian influence, because most of them weren't documented, and the others just got word-lists.

User avatar
WeepingElf
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 195
Joined: 23 Feb 2016 18:42
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: What would be the best approach for an Antarctic 'lang?

Post by WeepingElf » 10 Mar 2019 21:17

Of course, it is a long way from the Antarctic Peninsula, where people from southernmost South America would end up (and AFAIK Brad Coon placed his Feorran language), to Victoria Land, where that legendary Maori sailor probably arrived - in fact, they are almost diametrically opposed.
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf

GoshDiggityDangit
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 133
Joined: 18 Dec 2018 21:27
Location: Misawa AFB, Aomori, Japan

Re: What would be the best approach for an Antarctic 'lang?

Post by GoshDiggityDangit » 11 Mar 2019 06:24

WeepingElf wrote:
10 Mar 2019 21:17
Of course, it is a long way from the Antarctic Peninsula, where people from southernmost South America would end up (and AFAIK Brad Coon placed his Feorran language), to Victoria Land, where that legendary Maori sailor probably arrived - in fact, they are almost diametrically opposed.


Of course, but this isn't necessarily supposed to be a realistic language.

User avatar
WeepingElf
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 195
Joined: 23 Feb 2016 18:42
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: What would be the best approach for an Antarctic 'lang?

Post by WeepingElf » 11 Mar 2019 18:34

In that case, you need not worry about any of the things discussed here. But frankly, there are reasons why Antarctica has no native people - the environment is just too harsh for people without modern technology to thrive, it seems.
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf

Salmoneus
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1687
Joined: 19 Sep 2011 19:37

Re: What would be the best approach for an Antarctic 'lang?

Post by Salmoneus » 12 Mar 2019 02:28

That was my first reaction.

However, looking at it, it maybe might just be possible? The west coast of the antarctic peninsula is actually survivable, no worse than Inuit habitats in Greenland and Canada (and probably better). The big downside is that the temperature is only barely ever above freezing, so there's virtually no vegetation beyond a bit of moss (only two flowing plant species have been found anywhere in Antarctica).

I suspect that an Inuit-style diet heavily dependent on seals, supplemented with birds and bird eggs, might be viable. It would, however, be worse than the Inuit diet - Inuit can vary their diet with land mammals (caribou, etc) and with berries and the like. Antarctic hunters couldn't do that - they'd be all sealmeat-and-bird-eggs, all the time.

I think the big problem - other than getting there! - would be variation. Greenland, for example, has seen several rapidly annihilated societies - Independence I, Independence II, the Vikings, probably others. There are probably specific reasons for this, but a big one is that climate changes over time - the vikings disappeared when the little ice age sent temperatures plummeting. A barely survivable environment can be unsurvivable in a bad year. To some extent, the Inuit have managed to avoid this by (aside from by not appearing until relatively recently) through mobility - when things are bad, they can retreat. But if you're in O'Higgins Land, you can't retreat (or get help by trading for food and suplies). A run of bad winters could kill the whole population.

There's also, I think, a problem of adaptation. The Inuit are physically abnormal in being able to survive on their diet - they have giant livers, for a start. This probably reflects a period of adaptation - they would have started out in Siberia, moved to Alaska, and only as the final step were they evolved enough to be able to spread across the extreme icy environments they came to inhabit in modern times. Settlers in Antarctica would have to leap from the relatively benign Tierra del Fuego to the merciless antarctic in one bound, and that might be a physical challenge.


But looking at it, it seems like it would be more "highly improbable" than "outright impossible".

GoshDiggityDangit
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 133
Joined: 18 Dec 2018 21:27
Location: Misawa AFB, Aomori, Japan

Re: What would be the best approach for an Antarctic 'lang?

Post by GoshDiggityDangit » 18 Mar 2019 18:56

I was looking for resources for Selk'nam (Ona) and found this beauty: http://etnolinguistica.wdfiles.com/loca ... elknam.pdf
Now I just need to find something like this for Haush, and I can attempt to create a Proto-Island Chon language.

User avatar
WeepingElf
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 195
Joined: 23 Feb 2016 18:42
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: What would be the best approach for an Antarctic 'lang?

Post by WeepingElf » 25 Mar 2019 21:44

You could of course flout realism completely and invent a species of sapient penguins, whose language would obviously be unrelated to any human language ;)
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf

GoshDiggityDangit
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 133
Joined: 18 Dec 2018 21:27
Location: Misawa AFB, Aomori, Japan

Re: What would be the best approach for an Antarctic 'lang?

Post by GoshDiggityDangit » 26 Mar 2019 20:20

That sounds absolutely incredible!

User avatar
sangi39
moderator
moderator
Posts: 3319
Joined: 12 Aug 2010 01:53
Location: North Yorkshire, UK

Re: What would be the best approach for an Antarctic 'lang?

Post by sangi39 » 26 Mar 2019 21:34

WeepingElf wrote:
25 Mar 2019 21:44
You could of course flout realism completely and invent a species of sapient penguins, whose language would obviously be unrelated to any human language ;)
This could be me being stupid, but hasn't someone done that? [:P]
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.

User avatar
WeepingElf
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 195
Joined: 23 Feb 2016 18:42
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: What would be the best approach for an Antarctic 'lang?

Post by WeepingElf » 27 Mar 2019 22:52

I can't remember seeing a penguin conlang, but googling for "penguin conlang" throws up this old Reddit thread in which penguin phonology was discussed.

But my proposal to use sapient penguins rather than humans was not very serious. Certainly, a sapient penguin species is a MUCH bigger stretch, realism-wise, than an indigenous human population that somehow survives in the harsh environment of Antarctica!
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf

Post Reply