Attempts of a new collablang

A forum for all topics related to constructed languages
Post Reply
User avatar
k1234567890y
runic
runic
Posts: 2976
Joined: 04 Jan 2014 04:47
Contact:

Attempts of a new collablang

Post by k1234567890y » 04 Aug 2018 16:06

gotta make a new attempt of collaborative a priori lang.

Below are the votes:

1) size of consonant inventories?
a. small(14 consonants or less)
b. moderately small(15-18 consonants)
c. average(19-25 consonants)
d. moderately large(26-33 consonants)
e. large(34 consonants or more)

2) size of vowel inventories?
a. small(4 vowels or less)
b. average(5 or 6 vowels)
c. large(7 vowels or more)

3) Voicing in Plosives and Fricatives
a. No voicing constrast
b. In plosives alone
c. In fricatives alone
d. In both plosives and fricatives

4) Should we have uvulars?
a. None
b. Uvular stops only
c. Uvular continuants only
d. Uvular stops and continuants

5) Should we have glottalized consonants?

a. No glottalized consonants
b. Ejectives onl
c. Implosives only
d. Glottalized resonants only
e. Ejectives and implosives
f. Ejectives and glottalized resonants
g. Implosives and glottalized resonants
h. Ejectives, implosives, and glottalized resonants

6) What should we do about lateral consonants?

a. No laterals
b. /l/, no obstruent laterals
c. Laterals, but no /l/, no obstruent laterals
d. /l/ and lateral obstruent
e. No /l/, but lateral obstruents

7) Should we have a phonemic velar nasal? e.g. velar nasal as a phoneme, not just an allophone of /n/ before velar consonants.
a. Initial velar nasal
b. No initial velar nasal
c. No velar nasal

8) Should the language evolve from a proto-lang diachronically?
a. Yes
b. No
私のアツい人工言語活動!言カツ!始まります!!

shimobaatar
darkness
darkness
Posts: 11143
Joined: 12 Jul 2013 22:09
Location: PA → IN

Re: Attempts of a new collablang

Post by shimobaatar » 04 Aug 2018 16:22

1: b
2: b
3: b
4: b
5: a
6: d
7: a
8: a

Tanni
greek
greek
Posts: 755
Joined: 12 Aug 2010 01:05

Re: Attempts of a new collablang

Post by Tanni » 04 Aug 2018 16:31

1) size of consonant inventories?
b. moderately small(15-18 consonants)

2) size of vowel inventories?
c. large(7 vowels or more)

3) Voicing in Plosives and Fricatives
c. In fricatives alone

4) Should we have uvulars?
a. None

5) Should we have glottalized consonants?

a. No glottalized consonants

6) What should we do about lateral consonants?

e. No /l/, but lateral obstruents

7) Should we have a phonemic velar nasal? e.g. velar nasal as a phoneme, not just an allophone of /n/ before velar consonants.
a. Initial velar nasal
My neurochemistry has fucked my impulse control, now I'm diagnosed OOD = oppositional opinion disorder, one of the most deadly diseases in totalitarian states, but can be cured in the free world.

idov
sinic
sinic
Posts: 392
Joined: 13 Apr 2015 20:02

Re: Attempts of a new collablang

Post by idov » 05 Aug 2018 15:11

1) e.
2) a.
3) a.
4) a.
5) e.
6) Is having several laterals, none of them obstruent, an option? Example: /l ʎ/ If not: a.
7) b.
The accusative of <emo> is <eminem>. :lat:

User avatar
k1234567890y
runic
runic
Posts: 2976
Joined: 04 Jan 2014 04:47
Contact:

Re: Attempts of a new collablang

Post by k1234567890y » 05 Aug 2018 16:40

idov wrote:
05 Aug 2018 15:11
6) Is having several laterals, none of them obstruent, an option? Example: /l ʎ/ If not: a.
it is counted as b.
私のアツい人工言語活動!言カツ!始まります!!

User avatar
gestaltist
mayan
mayan
Posts: 1754
Joined: 11 Feb 2015 11:23

Re: Attempts of a new collablang

Post by gestaltist » 06 Aug 2018 09:26

I like to vote on these threads. Although they usually die sooner than I would like.

My votes:

1e
2a
3c
4a
5h
6d
7a
8a

User avatar
shanoxilt
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 189
Joined: 30 May 2016 05:51

Re: Attempts of a new collablang

Post by shanoxilt » 20 Aug 2018 01:55

Contact me when we get to semantics, syntax, or morphology.
Click here to join the Common Honey server. Or click here for a general glossopoeia server.

this_is_an_account
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 91
Joined: 14 Aug 2018 05:33

Re: Attempts of a new collablang

Post by this_is_an_account » 24 Aug 2018 04:32

I hope this is still going.

1: C~D~E
2: A~B
3: A~C
4: D
5: A~B~F
6: D (Does this include glottalized L if we get glottalized resonants?)
7: B~C
8: B

Sorry if these are too vague.

Porphyrogenitos
sinic
sinic
Posts: 227
Joined: 21 Jul 2012 07:01
Location: Buffalo, NY

Re: Attempts of a new collablang

Post by Porphyrogenitos » 24 Aug 2018 07:53

My votes:

1) size of consonant inventories?
b. moderately small(15-18 consonants)

2) size of vowel inventories?
b. average(5 or 6 vowels)

3) Voicing in Plosives and Fricatives
b. In plosives alone

4) Should we have uvulars?
d. Uvular stops and continuants

5) Should we have glottalized consonants?
a. No glottalized consonants

6) What should we do about lateral consonants?
b. /l/, no obstruent laterals

7) Should we have a phonemic velar nasal? e.g. velar nasal as a phoneme, not just an allophone of /n/ before velar consonants.
a. Initial velar nasal

8) Should the language evolve from a proto-lang diachronically?
b. No

(it should, essentially, be the proto-language. we will introduce rules such that it shall have an underlying structure reflecting a more regular earlier stage, discernible through internal reconstruction, and a surface structure reflecting its present-day stage.)

User avatar
CarsonDaConlanger
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 168
Joined: 02 Nov 2017 20:55

Re: Attempts of a new collablang

Post by CarsonDaConlanger » 22 Oct 2018 15:01

Where are we at on this? Could we tally the votes and move on?
1) size of consonant inventories?
b. moderately small(15-18 consonants)

2) size of vowel inventories?
b. average(5 or 6 vowels)


3) Voicing in Plosives and Fricatives
b. In plosives alone

4) Should we have uvulars?
a. None

5) Should we have glottalized consonants?
a. No glottalized consonants

6) What should we do about lateral consonants?
b. /l/, no obstruent laterals

7) Should we have a phonemic velar nasal? e.g. velar nasal as a phoneme, not just an allophone of /n/ before velar consonants.
c. No velar nasal

8) Should the language evolve from a proto-lang diachronically?
b. No

Nachtuil
sinic
sinic
Posts: 424
Joined: 20 Jul 2016 23:16

Re: Attempts of a new collablang

Post by Nachtuil » 23 Oct 2018 03:28

1) d
2) b
3) b
4) b
5) b
6) c
7) c
8) b

User avatar
jimydog000
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 103
Joined: 19 Mar 2016 04:14
Location: Australia

Re: Attempts of a new collablang

Post by jimydog000 » 26 Oct 2018 13:05

1) size of consonant inventories?
d. moderately large(26-33 consonants)

2) size of vowel inventories?
a. small(4 vowels or less)

3) Voicing in Plosives and Fricatives
d. In both plosives and fricatives

4) Should we have uvulars?
a. None

5) Should we have glottalized consonants?
h. Ejectives, implosives, and glottalized resonants

6) What should we do about lateral consonants?
b. /l/, no obstruent laterals

7) Should we have a phonemic velar nasal? e.g. velar nasal as a phoneme, not just an allophone of /n/ before velar consonants.
c. No velar nasal

8) Should the language evolve from a proto-lang diachronically?
a. Yes

Hit me up when we get past this voting.
“Comparison is the death of joy.” -Mark Twain

Post Reply