Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

A forum for all topics related to constructed languages
ɶʙ ɞʛ
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 106
Joined: 02 Aug 2019 18:47

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by ɶʙ ɞʛ » 02 Aug 2019 18:53

Initial:
/m n ŋ/
/p t ts k/
/b d dz g/
/f s z x h/
/w l r j/

/i e a o u/

pp tt kk > p’ t’ k’
pt pts pk > t’ ts’ k’
tp tts tk > ɓ ts’ k’ > w ts’ k’
ts > s _C
kp kt kts > ʘ ! ǀ̠ > ɓ ɗ ɗz > w l z
p’ > ɓ > w, but before consonants epenthetic ǝ is inserted.


mn mŋ > wn wŋ
nŋ nm > ɹŋ ɹm > ǝŋ ǝm
ŋm ŋn > jm wn

nC > ǝC if C is not coronal

p > pf in onset, h in coda

pf > f > h _C, also eliminating pre-existing f there

aǝ eǝ iǝ oǝ uǝ > ai e: i: o: u:

s z > ʃ ʒ next to i e

ih eh ah oh uh > ɪh ǝh ǝh ɔh ʊh

a ɔ > ɒ, ʊ > o

Short e i > ǝ ɪ, short u > ʊ > o

ɪ > ǝ, ǝ > a

Remaining f > h, but pf word initially

g > h in coda, x in onset

/m n ŋ/
/t’ ts’ tʃ’ k’/
/pf t ts tʃ k/
/b d dz dʒ/
/s z ʃ ʒ x h/
/w l r j/

/ǝ i: a e: ɒ o: o u: ai/

Tin > ti: > tʃi:
Ti > tʃǝ
p:na > p’ǝna > wǝna > wanɒ

ɶʙ ɞʛ
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 106
Joined: 02 Aug 2019 18:47

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by ɶʙ ɞʛ » 09 Aug 2019 06:03

Fortis stops: /p t ʈ~k/ [p'~p t'~t ʈ'~ʈ~k'~k]
Lenis stops: /b d ɖ g ɢ ʔ/ [pʰ~b tʰ~d ʈʰ~ɖ kʰ~ɣ qʰ~ʁ ʔ~0]
Fortis continuants: /f f: s s: ʂ ʂ: χ χ:/ [f~v pf~f s~z ts~s ʂ~ʐ tʂ~ʂ χ~ʁ qχ~χ]
Lenis continuants: /ɸ ɸ: θ θ: x x: h h:/ [h~w hʷ h~ɹ h~θ h~ɣ h~ʂ~x~kx h~0 h~ʔh]

/ɪ ɵ ɛ ə ɑ/
/i: ʉ: e: ɯ: a:/

User avatar
Linguifex
roman
roman
Posts: 956
Joined: 03 Aug 2012 08:07
Location: Ohio

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by Linguifex » 15 Aug 2019 02:57

Something I'm working on for a triconsonantal language:

p t tʷ tʲ tʲʷ k kʷ ʔ ʔʷ
s sʷ ʃ ʃʷ
w l lʷ j ɥ

a aː ã ə əː ə̃

a ə → ɒ u / Cʷ_ (/p/ is treated as rounded for purposes of this rule)
a ə → æ i / else
S → N / _V[+ nasal]
Cʷ → C[- round] / _# (/p w/ are exempt; I'm not sure if I should have /p/ debuccalize to [h], here or elsewhere; thoughts?)

Cannot have three plosives in a root
Cannot have three rounded obstruents in a root
(Avatar via Happy Wheels Wiki)
Index Diachronica PDF v.10.0
Conworld megathread

AVDIO · VIDEO · DISCO

User avatar
LinguoFranco
greek
greek
Posts: 461
Joined: 20 Jul 2016 17:49
Location: U.S.

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by LinguoFranco » 16 Aug 2019 16:42

/m n ɲ ŋ/
/p t t͡s c k/
/ᵐb ⁿd ⁿd͡ʒ ᶮɟ ᵑɡ/
/s ʃ ɬ h/
/z ɮ/
/l ʎ j w/

/a e i o u/

I don't know how naturalistic this is, and I'm uncertain about the fricatives as I may add /f v/. The language is syllable-timed and has an unfixed stress. The maximum syllable allowed is CGVC.

ɶʙ ɞʛ
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 106
Joined: 02 Aug 2019 18:47

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by ɶʙ ɞʛ » 18 Aug 2019 22:08

/m n ŋ/
/p t ts tɬ k/
/s ɬ h/
/l/

/ɑ ɛ ə ɪ ɞ/
/ɑ: e: ɯ: i: ʉ:/

/p/ is realized as /p/ normally. However, next to /ɪ/ or /i:/, it is realized as /p̪f/, /t̼/, or /t̪θ/. It is lenited to a fricative /ɸ/, /f/, /θ̼/, or /θ/ intervocalically. Thus, /ɑpɛ/ [ɑɸə], /ɑpɪ/ [æf~æθ̼~æθ].
/pə tə kə/ are realized as [p~h t~tʰ k~kʰ~x] if before a vowel or end of word. Similarly, /pɞ tɞ kɞ/ are realized as [p~ɸ tʷ~tʷʰ kʷ~kʷʰ~xʷ] in the same environments.
/ɪpə/ [ɪh] /ɪkɞ/ [ɪçʷ]
[t s ɬ ts tɬ kɬ l k x m n ŋ] become [c ʃ ƛ tʃ cƛ cƛ λ c ç ɱ~n̼~n̪ ɲ ɲ] next to /ɪ i:/. /ɪ ə ɞ/ are deleted before a vowel or end of word, and /ɑ ɛ/ are realized as [a i] in those environments.

/ɑ ɞ ɛ ə/ are [æ œ e ɪ] next to palatal(ized) or coronal consonants, and [ʌ ʊ ə ω] next to velars, and [ɑ ɞ ɛ ə] if next to both.

User avatar
Shemtov
runic
runic
Posts: 3081
Joined: 29 Apr 2013 04:06

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by Shemtov » 20 Aug 2019 22:06

The Phonology of Ṛemese, (From the Endonym of the largest island, Ṛem, /ɻem/ whose language acts as a lingua franca for the The Crowned Republic of Ṛem and The United Islands), an altlang which is an Austronesian language spoken in the IRL South Ryukyu Islands:
/t k/ <t k>
/t͡ʃ d͡ʒ/ <ch j>
/m n ɲ/ <m n ny>
/ɾ/ <rr>
/ɸ s ʃ h ɦ/ <f s sh h ȟ>
/ɹ ɻ j w/ < r ṛ y w>

/i y u e o ə a/ <i ü u e o ǎ a>
Many children make up, or begin to make up, imaginary languages. I have been at it since I could write.
-JRR Tolkien

holbuzvala
sinic
sinic
Posts: 216
Joined: 01 Jan 2017 14:03

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by holbuzvala » 21 Aug 2019 22:56

A question on diachronics

So I have /tʰ/ which changes to /r̥/ when bounded by vowels or a word boundary. e.g.: /tʰatʰ/-> /r̥ar̥/, /atʰa/ -> /ar̥a/.

However, I am having trouble deciding what /tʰ/ should become when adjacent to other consonants, particularly stops and voiced sonorants. The current consonant inventory is as follows:

/p t k pʰ tʰ kʰ pʲ tʲ kʲ pʷ tʷ kʷ/
/s t͡s/
/m n ŋ/
/r l ɣ/

Any ideas? /pʰ/ becomes /f/ everywhere, so maybe /tʰ/ could become /s/ in clusters?

Birdlang
greek
greek
Posts: 758
Joined: 25 Dec 2014 20:17
Location: Virginia

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by Birdlang » 23 Aug 2019 00:45

Some conlangs. My main ones all redone.
Birdish
/p b t d k g ʔ/ p b t d k g ʼ
/ɸ β s z ɕ~ʃ ʑ~ʒ x~h ɣ/ f v s z x j ħ ģ
/ʦ ʣ ʨ~ʧ ʥ~ʤ/ ç ʒ c ĵ
/m n ɲ ŋ/ m n ñ ŋ
/l ʎ j ɰ~ʋ/ l ɫ y w
/ɾ r/ r ŗ
/ɮ/ ḷ

/Ø~Vː/ h

/i e ɛ a/ i ė e a
/ɯ u ʊ ɤ o ʌ ɔ ɒ/ ü u ù õ ȯ ö o ȧ
/ɨ ʉ ə ɜ/ î û ë ä
/Vː/ VV or V̄ or Vh
/Vʔ/ V’
Breve is used when vowels are pronounced shorter.

Pheasanti
/m n ɲ ŋ/ m n ñ/ny ng
/p b t d k g ʔ/ p b t d k g ʼ
/f v s z ʃ ʒ h/ f v s z š/sh ž/zh h
/ʧ ʤ/ č/ky/ty j/dy/gy
/l ʎ j w/ l ĺ/ly y w
/ɾ r/ r (medial and final) r (initial)/rr (other)

/i y u e ø ɤ o a/ i ü u e ʌ ə o a
Vowels can be long, written with macron.
Diphthongs are present, with glide in diphthong written as i/e/u/o/ü with a breve above.
Modern Standard Birdish
/m n ɲ ŋ/ m n ñ ŋ
/p b t d k g ʔ/ p b t d k g '
/ɸ β s z ʃ ʒ x~h ɣ/ f v s z x j ḥ ģ
/ʦ ʣ ʧ ʤ/ ç ʒ c ĵ
/l ʎ j ɰ~ɣ/ l ɫ y w
/ɾ r/ r ŕ
/ɮ/ ĺ

/i ɨ ʉ u ʊ e ɤ~ø ə o ɛ ʌ~œ ɔ a/ i ï ü u ŏ é ŭ ë ó e ö o a
Long vowels = VV/Vh/V̄
Ꭓꭓ Ʝʝ Ɬɬ Ɦɦ Ɡɡ Ɥɥ Ɫɫ Ɽɽ Ɑɑ Ɱɱ Ɐɐ Ɒɒ Ɓɓ Ɔɔ Ɖɖ Ɗɗ Əə Ɛɛ Ɠɠ Ɣɣ Ɯɯ Ɲɲ Ɵɵ Ʀʀ Ʃʃ Ʈʈ Ʊʊ Ʋʋ Ʒʒ Ꞵꞵ Ʉʉ Ʌʌ Ŋŋ Ɂɂ Ɪɪ Ææ Øø Ð𠌜 Ɜɜ Ǝɘ

Ryan Aditya
hieroglyphic
hieroglyphic
Posts: 55
Joined: 18 Jul 2019 14:45

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by Ryan Aditya » 28 Aug 2019 11:23

/m n ŋ/
/p b t d k ɡ ʔ/
/ts dz/
/θ ð s z h/
/r j w/
/l/

/i ɨ ɯ u/
/e ə o/
/ɛ ɔ/
/a ä ɑ/

Allophone of consonants
/n t~ts~k d~dz~ɡ θ~s ð~z h l/ before /i/, /e/ or if palatized:
[ɲ tɕ dʑ ɕ ʑ ç ʎ]
/h l/ before /ɯ/ or /ɑ/:
[x ɫ]
/t d h/ before /u/, /o/ or if labialized:
[ts dz ɸ]

User avatar
Omzinesý
runic
runic
Posts: 2671
Joined: 27 Aug 2010 08:17
Location: nowhere [naʊhɪɚ]

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by Omzinesý » 01 Sep 2019 01:11

Attempt for an orthography where <s> represents / ʃ/ and <c/ci> represents/s/

p t c k (/k/ only appears after back vowels) <p t c(after back vowels)/k after front vowels k>
b d ɟ g (/g/ only appears after back vowels) <b d g g>
m n ɲ <m n nj>
f s ʃ <f c(after front vowels)/ci(after back vowels) s>
v z h <v z h>
r l ʎ <r l lj>
j <j>
Last edited by Omzinesý on 01 Sep 2019 19:05, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
DesEsseintes
mongolian
mongolian
Posts: 4583
Joined: 31 Mar 2013 13:16

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by DesEsseintes » 01 Sep 2019 13:08

Sōkoan vowels latest:

Code: Select all

← back    front → 
   ɑ        a
 o   ɤ    ɛ̠   e
 u   ɯ    ɨ   i 

DV82LECM
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 123
Joined: 16 Dec 2016 03:31

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by DV82LECM » 01 Sep 2019 19:26

Am asking, how does someone distinguish this?

/a ä ɑ/

User avatar
Ser
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 88
Joined: 30 Jun 2012 06:13
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia / Colombie Britannique, Canada

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by Ser » 01 Sep 2019 21:43

DV82LECM wrote:
01 Sep 2019 19:26
Am asking, how does someone distinguish this?

/a ä ɑ/
When speaking, you put your tongue in different positions when pronouncing each of the three. When listening, some part of your brain interprets the signals and identifies their acoustic differences to distinguish them.

This looks like a facetious answer, but it's not. If you have difficulties to distinguish them because of your native language, this doesn't mean that others do. Many Spanish speakers are unable to distinguish all three of "soak", "suck" and "sock" as pronounced by speakers of American English, and American English speakers tend to find this baffling. On the other hand, speakers of American English (and Spanish) have a lot of trouble distinguishing German /e:/ from /i:/.

It is also possible that these so-called "/a ä ɑ/" phonemes are actually abstractions of much more distinct surface phones. For example, it's possible that /ɑ/ triggers velarization in the consonant before, while /a/ has an effect in the consonant before it (perhaps for historical reasons, due to /a/ coming from earlier /jä/), without mentioning that perhaps one or two of them are usually long except in some environments. This would lead to minimal pairs like:
/kam käm kɑm/ [tʃam käm kʷɑ:m].

Please note that it is very unusual to use "/a ä ɑ/" as the notation. The convention in linguistics is to use "/æ a ɑ/" instead, regardless of what the IPA table might suggest. Outside the IPA, in Chinese linguistics "/a ᴀ ɑ/" is preferred, using a small ᴀ for the central vowel.

DV82LECM
cuneiform
cuneiform
Posts: 123
Joined: 16 Dec 2016 03:31

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by DV82LECM » 01 Sep 2019 21:55

Ser wrote:
01 Sep 2019 21:43
DV82LECM wrote:
01 Sep 2019 19:26
Am asking, how does someone distinguish this?

/a ä ɑ/
When speaking, you put your tongue in different positions when pronouncing each of the three. When listening, some part of your brain interprets the signals and identifies their acoustic differences to distinguish them.

This looks like a facetious answer, but it's not. If you have difficulties to distinguish them because of your native language, this doesn't mean that others do. Many Spanish speakers are unable to distinguish all three of "soak", "suck" and "sock" as pronounced by speakers of American English, and American English speakers tend to find this baffling. On the other hand, speakers of American English (and Spanish) have a lot of trouble distinguishing German /e:/ from /i:/.

It is also possible that these so-called "/a ä ɑ/" phonemes are actually abstractions of much more distinct surface phones. For example, it's possible that /ɑ/ triggers velarization in the consonant before, while /a/ has an effect in the consonant before it (perhaps for historical reasons, due to /a/ coming from earlier /jä/), without mentioning that perhaps one or two of them are usually long except in some environments. This would lead to minimal pairs like:
/kam käm kɑm/ [tʃam käm kʷɑ:m].

Please note that it is very unusual to use "/a ä ɑ/" as the notation. The convention in linguistics is to use "/æ a ɑ/" instead, regardless of what the IPA table might suggest. Outside the IPA, in Chinese linguistics "/a ᴀ ɑ/" is preferred, using a small ᴀ for the central vowel.
First off, thank you for that. Second, is there any living language that does present the front and central <a> as two distinguishable sounds? That's my whole point.

User avatar
Zekoslav
sinic
sinic
Posts: 238
Joined: 07 Oct 2017 16:54

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by Zekoslav » 02 Sep 2019 11:48

I'm not sure about this, but I seem to remember that no languages distinguishing a front and a central /a/ is precisely the reason why no separate symbols for the two exist in IPA. However, a language that does distinguish them may have been discovered since the invention of the IPA.
Languages:
:hrv: [:D], :bih: :srb: [;)], :eng: [:D], :fra: [:|], :lat: [:(], :deu: [:'(]

A linguistics enthusiast who would like to make a conlang, but can't decide what to call what.

- Tewanian languages
- Guide to Slavic accentuation

User avatar
eldin raigmore
korean
korean
Posts: 6387
Joined: 14 Aug 2010 19:38
Location: SouthEast Michigan

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by eldin raigmore » 02 Sep 2019 16:41

Zekoslav wrote:
02 Sep 2019 11:48
I'm not sure about this, but I seem to remember that no languages distinguishing a front and a central /a/ is precisely the reason why no separate symbols for the two exist in IPA. However, a language that does distinguish them may have been discovered since the invention of the IPA.
In IPA the central one is near-open rather than open.
There are definitely languages that have both an open (low) front vowel and an open (low) back vowel.
Woisika appears to also have a central open vowel.
Spoiler:

The 'short no_mod voice low unrounded vowels' sounds occur 2 or more times in these languages:

Language (sounds) Sound % of sounds in language
ASHUSLAY (28) a, a_ 7.14%
AZERBAIJANI (33) a+, a_ 6.06%
BRAO (31) a, a+ 6.45%
DAN (39) a, a+ 5.13%
FARSI (30) a+, a_ 6.67%
FE?FE? (25) a+, a_ 8.00%
KHMER (42) a+, a_ 4.76%
KONKANI (37) a, a+ 5.41%
KOTOKO (36) a+, a_ 5.56%
NAMBAKAENGO (47) a, a_ 4.26%
NGANASAN (29) a, a+ 6.90%
PHLONG (37) a, a+ 5.41%
SELKUP (34) a, a+ 5.88%
SINHALESE (36) a+, a_ 5.56%
TEMNE (25) a, a_ 8.00%
WOISIKA (28) a, a+, a_ 10.71%

These 16 languages are 3.55% of all languages in UPSID.


The criterion 'short no_mod voice low unrounded vowels' matches with these sounds:


Sound Description Sound occurs in % of UPSID's languages
a low central unrounded vowel 86.92%
a+ low front unrounded vowel 5.76%
a_ low back unrounded vowel 5.54%

These 3 sounds make 0.33% of all 919 sounds in UPSID
Woisika also contains a low back rounded vowel.
So does Dan. It contains front unrounded, central unrounded, and back rounded low vowels.

—————

Still, if a language that has an open central vowel, its lowest front and back vowels are likelier to be open-mid or near-open; and if a language has both an open front vowel and an open back vowel, its lowest central vowel is likelier to be open-mid or near-open.
Otherwise the lowest row or two of the vowel-chart is just too crowded.
Blackness/frontness differences between vowels the same height (closeness), are easier to articulate and to hear, the closer (higher) the vowels are.

User avatar
DesEsseintes
mongolian
mongolian
Posts: 4583
Joined: 31 Mar 2013 13:16

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by DesEsseintes » 02 Sep 2019 17:00

Zekoslav wrote:
02 Sep 2019 11:48
I'm not sure about this, but I seem to remember that no languages distinguishing a front and a central /a/ is precisely the reason why no separate symbols for the two exist in IPA. However, a language that does distinguish them may have been discovered since the invention of the IPA.
The Hamont dialect of Limburgish has previously been cited on this forum as a language that distinguishes front, central and back low vowels.

User avatar
Omzinesý
runic
runic
Posts: 2671
Joined: 27 Aug 2010 08:17
Location: nowhere [naʊhɪɚ]

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by Omzinesý » 03 Sep 2019 17:36

p t k ʔ
f θ x h
s
m n ŋ
l j w

User avatar
Frislander
runic
runic
Posts: 3496
Joined: 14 May 2016 18:47
Location: The North

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by Frislander » 04 Sep 2019 18:45

The New and Improved Proto-Muyan.

*p *t *ʈ *c *k *q
*pʰ *tʰ *ʈʰ *cʰ *kʰ *qʰ
*m *n *ŋ
*w *l *j

The series labeled as alveolar and retroflex were more likely dental-laminal and apical respectively. The stopped nature of the palatals is debatable.

*iː *ʊ *uː
*ɛː *ə *ɒː

*iː *uː *ɛː *ɒː were full vowels, *ə *ʊ reduced. All vowels distinguished modal and creaky voice.

Syllable structure was CV(n), where coda /n/ assimilated to the POA of a following consonant and completely to a following /l/.

Root structure was limited - Roots could consist of either a single syllable with a full vowel, two syllables with reduced vowels, or a syllable with a full vowel followed by a syllable with a reduced vowel.

Example

cətʰəjiːtʰiː cʰɒ̰ːllə ŋiːlɒːʈʰʊ
cə-<əj>tʰiː-PROG cʰɒ̰ːllə ŋiː-lɒːʈʰʊ
PROX-<2>eat-PROG smoke LOC-hut
You're smoking in the hut

User avatar
Omzinesý
runic
runic
Posts: 2671
Joined: 27 Aug 2010 08:17
Location: nowhere [naʊhɪɚ]

Re: Random phonology/phonemic inventory thread

Post by Omzinesý » 12 Sep 2019 22:12

I'm still playing with the same-ish phonology.

pʰ tʰ t͡ɕ kʰ <p t cx k>
p~b t~d c~ɟ k~g <b d c g>
m̥ʰ n̥ʰ ɲ̥ʰ ŋ̥ʰ <mh nh nch ngh>
m n ɲ ŋ <m n nc ng>
s ɕ <s x>
l j ɰ w <l j q w>

i ɯ u <i y u>
e̞ ɘ̞ o̞ <e a o>
a ɑ ɒ <e̩ a̩ o̩>


Stress is fixed on the penultimate syllable. Stressed syllables have either a rising tone <á> or a lowering tone <à>.

Vowels cannot be phonemically long. Two adjacent, same, unstressed vowels are however usually pronounced together.


Phonotactics:
(C)(C)(G)(V) where j stands for a glide.

Consonant clusters can be:
i) two stops or two nasals the leftmost of them having no own release. A palatal and a velar cannot, however, form such a cluster.
ii) a non-labial obstruent + /l/. /l/ assimilates with the place or articulation of the preceding obstruent. If the obstruent is aspirated /l/ is devoiced, and they form a phonetic lateral affricate. (I'm still not sure how /t͡ɕ/ + /l/ realises.)
Clusters i) and ii) cannot be combined for three-member clusters.

Any of the three glides /j ɰ w/ can precede a non-high vowel.




Code: Select all

pt, pcx, pk, tp, tcx, tk, cp, ct, kp, kt = 10
bd, bc, bg, db, dc, dg, cb, cd, kb, kd  = 10
mnh, mnch, mngh, nmh, nnch, nngh, ncmh, ncnh, ngmh, ngnh = 10
mn, mnc, mng, nm, nnc, nng, ncm, ncn, ngm, ngn = 10 
tl, cxl, kl = 3
dl, cl, gl = 3
sl, xl =2 

je, ja, jo, je̩ ja̩ jo̩
qe, qa, qo, qe̩ qa̩ qo̩
we, wa, wo, we̩ wa̩ wo̩

(22 single consonants + 48 clusters) * (9 single vowels + 18 diphthongs) = 1890 possible syllables. Most roots are bisyllabic. 

Post Reply